(WASHINGTON) — For Mitt Romney’s campaign, the outlook in the battleground states is even worse than the national polls.
According to a GOP source with access to private polling being done by independent Republican groups (who are spending a lot of money tracking public opinion in the battleground states), Romney is in trouble in two must-win states:
Most troubling for Romney: the Ohio trend has been consistent for several weeks and is not a “sugar high” resulting from the Democratic convention.
These internal state-by-state tracking polls show some positive signs for Romney, but nowhere near enough to compensate for Ohio and Virginia. The good news:
Could Romney win without Ohio and Virginia? It’s mathematically possible, but so is winning the lottery. Consider this scenario:
If Romney loses Ohio and Virginia, he must run the table in all the battleground states won by Obama in 2008 where the Romney campaign is now running ads: Florida, North Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, Wisconsin, Colorado and New Hampshire.
The result, assuming Obama wins the one electoral vote awarded independently by Omaha, Neb.: An electoral tie — 269 to 269.
In case of a tie in the electoral college, according to the 12th Amendment, the House of Representatives decides the presidential election. Each state gets one vote.
Romney would seem to have the edge in that scenario.
Of the 50 state delegations in the House, just 14 are Democratically-controlled House delegations and 33 are controlled by Republicans. Three states are split evenly. Right now, the whole number of the House is 430; there are five vacancies in the House that won’t be filled until after the election.
These numbers are driving decisions on spending hundreds of millions of dollars, but are also contributing to the sense of gloom among top Republicans about the direction of the campaign.
Copyright 2012 ABC News Radio
Ruth Brown, Idaho Press-Tribune
Nate Eaton, EastIdahoNews.com