Former Member of SnapChat Development Team Sues to ‘Get His Cut’

iStockphoto/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) -- The co-founders of SnapChat are in dispute over the photo and video sharing app's beginnings, and now a lawsuit is brewing.  

Launched in 2011 by Stanford students Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy, the app has amassed huge popularity for allowing the transmission of photos and videos that vanish in a set period of time, with no record stored on your cellphone. This has lead to a lot of venture capital investment and a recent report that values SnapChat at approximately $800 million. (Sums differ on different reports.) That’s a pretty sweet piece of pie, and has lead to a semi-identical Facebook lawsuit from an aggrieved ex-friend of Murphy and Spiegel.

Frank ‘Reggie’ Brown IV, a 23-year-old, claims he was part of the initial development team and wants his cut of the SnapLoot. He says he was doublecrossed by Speigel and Murphy and that he should have equity.

Brown was a student with Murphy and Spiegel at Stanford, and they lived in the same dorm.

They started work together on SnapChat -- first called Pictaboo and Picaboo -- however, somehow relations went south and their partnership dissolved. The company was first called Future Freshman LLC and was then renamed the Toyopa Group with no mention of Brown on the Crunchbase filing.

On the SnapChat blog there is zero mention of Brown.

“My co-founder Bobby and I met at Stanford in 2009. I was a freshman studying Product Design and Bobby was a junior working on his B.S. in Mathematical and Computational Science,” wrote Spiegel. “In April 2011 we moved into the not yet lucrative world of mobile photo sharing. We thought there was an opportunity to do something different. We wanted a place to share awkward selfie’s and funny photos with our friends.”

Further details have surfaced, making their wicked way across the web. This week new evidence has arisen on Business Insider which shows alleged text messages between Brown and Spiegel that gives Brown’s claim of ownership a lot more weight.

Supposed emails, texts exchanges, and group photos all suggest that Brown was pretty involved in the startup. Sure, Brown might not have filed a lawsuit till he saw the company was starting to make waves, but does that mean he should forfeit his rights -- and did he have any to begin with?

In February 2013 Brown filed a lawsuit stating, “that he originally conceived of the Snapchat concept, designed the logo, and came up with the app's original name.” The documents list seven complaints, which start with “betraying a fellow partner” and finish with “asking for relief (a.k.a money).”

So far SnapChat has not been very responsive to these questions. There is no denying that Brown was involved in some way at the start of the business, but the level of his involvement is a tale of he said and he said.

This is the big question and so far all we really have is lots of conjecture. Well, that and some murky dealings. For instance, SnapChat’s current lawyer formerly consulted for Brown.

SnapChat is staying silent, releasing this statement to TechCrunch in February: "We are aware of the allegations, believe them to be utterly devoid of merit, and will vigorously defend ourselves against this frivolous suit. It would be inappropriate to comment further on this pending legal matter."

Two questions remain to be answered. Was Brown a key player in SnapChat creation, or was he an ideas man who didn’t do any work? Does that matter? Well, it depends on whether you think there’s value in an idea without the product to back it up. Then, there’s what patent law says in regards to conceptualizing ideas.

U.S. Patent Attorney Gene Quinn says on his website, IP Watchdog that, “despite what these advertisements say, you cannot patent or protect an idea. You will need to move from idea to invention and ultimately to a patent application.” Whether or not Brown has a case will ultimately depend on how much work he put into SnapChat.

Another issue is whether SnapChat actually has any money to payout. Considering the valuation, you have to remember that this is all venture capitalist money and projected values, and that the company itself has no revenue model at all. Brown is asking for around 20-30 percent equity, and that could well be a percentage of nothing if SnapChat goes under.

Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio

Advertise With Us

Would you like to advertise on East Idaho News? Fill out this form to contact a representative.
  • Full and Last
  • The name of your company, business or brand.