• Fri 85°F / 51°F

Plan to Rid Syria of Chemical Weapons Has Murky Origin

Win McNamee/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- Obama administration officials say the idea to put Syria’s chemical weapons under international control, and to have Russia help broker a resolution, has been on the table for some time. President Obama, they say, discussed it with President Vladimir Putin as far back as the June 2012 G20 summit in Los Cabos, Mexico.

The White House maintains that Russia has consistently obstructed all diplomatic efforts at the United Nations to address the Syrian chemical weapons issue and hold the Assad regime to account.  The administration, ABC News’ Jon Karl has reported, has published a white paper casting Russia as obstructionists at every turn.

But then, on Friday, Sept. 6, in St. Petersburg, Putin approached Obama and raised the issue of the Syria crisis, officials on both sides say.  The two men spoke privately without note-takers for 20 to 30 minutes.  After the meeting, Obama aides said the conversation was “not acrimonious” and included talk about how they might work together on Syria in the future but came to no agreements.

Putin said at a press conference after the Obama meeting: “We have agreed on some possible scenarios designed to settle this crisis peacefully,” adding that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry would be in touch.

There is no indication that a concrete proposal along the lines of what Russia is now floating was on the table or agreed to during the Obama-Putin meeting.

Fast-forward to Monday, Sept. 9.

Speaking in London, Kerry opened the door to the possibility of averting U.S. military action.  “He [Assad] could turn over every bit of his weapons to the international community within the next week, without delay,” Kerry said in London. “But he isn’t about to.”

The State Department later declared the proposal “rhetorical.”  ”His point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago,” Kerry spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.

Planned or not, Kerry’s comment triggered a reaction from Russia, with Foreign Minister Lavrov promptly phoning Kerry to speak about a Russian proposal.  A senior State Department official confirms that before Lavrov made his initial public statement about a diplomatic plan, he and Kerry spoke by phone about it and Kerry knew what Lavrov was going to propose.

In a statement on Monday morning, Lavrov called on the “Syrian leadership not only agree on a statement of storage of chemical weapons under international control, but also its subsequent destruction.”

Vitaly Churkin, Russian ambassador to the United States, later told PBS: “We are responding to what Secretary Kerry said today. The news of Mr. Kerry’s statement came after the talks and were very promptly responded to by our foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, who came up with this initiative.”

Churkin said Lavrov and Kerry had spoken about this idea in previous “recent” conversations. “I think there is reason to believe that this was not something which was done completely extemporaneously,” he said of Kerry.

Still, the Russian proposal appeared to catch the White House off guard.  At a 1:30 p.m. ET briefing with reporters Monday, deputy national security adviser Tony Blinken and press secretary Jay Carney expressed surprise.

“We literally just heard about this as you did some hours ago,” Blinken said. “So we haven’t had a chance to look at it yet.  We haven’t had a chance to talk to the Russians about it yet.”

Added Carney: “Syria was, as it has been for quite some time, a subject of conversation between the two leaders and all the various counterparts who have engaged in conversation between the U.S. and the Russians over these past several weeks and months.”

By evening, Obama suggested that he had discussed with Russia the very idea of international control of Syria’s chemical weapons that had been floated earlier in the day.  The comments have sparked intrigue about whether Kerry’s earlier remarks might have been planned.

“These are conversations that I’ve had directly with Mr. Putin,” Obama told CNN. “When I was at the G20, we had some time to discuss this.”

It is unclear whether “this” refers to Russia’s specific proposal. “I believe that Mr. Putin does not see the use of chemical weapons as a good thing inside of Syria or anyplace else,” Obama added.

Asked by PBS’ Gwen Ifill whether he had any conversations with Putin about a plan to allow Syria to put its chemical weapons under international control, Obama said, “I did have those conversations.  And this is a continuation of conversations I’ve had with President Putin for quite some time.”

Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov said Tuesday, per Interfax, that it’s “true, the matter was discussed.”

He didn’t say who raised the matter.

While the origin of the latest proposal is a bit murky, one thing is clear; both the United States and Russia claim some hand in achieving it.

“The proposal for establishing international control over Syria’s chemical weapons is not quite Russian,” Lavrov said Tuesday. “It derives from exchanges we had with American colleagues and from yesterday’s statement by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, who said that a strike could be avoided if this problem is solved.”

For his part, Kerry told members of Congress Tuesday morning that he did not “misspeak” Monday when he floated the diplomatic option.  He said it arose from conversations with his Russian counterpart in the past week.

“I had some conversations about this with my counterpart from Russia last week,” Kerry said. “President Putin raised the issue with President Obama at St. Petersburg. President Obama directed us to try to continue to talk and see if it is possible. So it is not something that, you know, suddenly emerged, though it did publicly.”

Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio

Advertise With Us

Would you like to advertise on East Idaho News? Fill out this form to contact a representative.
  • Full and Last
  • The name of your company, business or brand.