On Tape, NY Man on Trial for Son's Murder Says He Left Him to Die - East Idaho News
National

On Tape, NY Man on Trial for Son’s Murder Says He Left Him to Die

  Published at  | Updated at

GETTY 10813 Gavel?  SQUARESPACE CACHEVERSION=1381231662973iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — A central New York man, who is awaiting trial for the death of his son, is heard saying on never-before-heard tapes obtained by ABC News that he accidentally caused a truck to fall on his son, crushing him, and then left him to die.

Karl Karlsen, 52, is in a jail cell in Waterloo, N.Y., facing charges of second-degree murder and insurance fraud in the death of his son.  Karlsen has pleaded not guilty.

In 2008, Karlsen’s 23-year-old son Levi Karlsen was crushed to death when the truck he was working on slipped off its jack and landed on top of him.

While wearing a wire in a crowded restaurant last year, Cindy Karlsen, Karl’s second and now estranged wife, asked her husband to tell the truth about his son’s death.  On the tapes, Karl said he had removed his truck’s front tires and raised it on a single jack before Levi volunteered to do the repair.

The tapes, which had been played in court, had never been played publicly until now.

“I didn’t push the truck, I said,” Karl continued after Cindy pressed him for answers about Levi’s death.  “No, I said I had nothing to do — but I said I took advantage of the situation once it happened.”

With what police saw as incriminating statements captured on Cindy’s audio recordings, they brought Karl in for questioning. During a nearly 10-hour interview, investigators said Karl denied killing his son 75 times, and that he’s given several explanations for his son’s death, including that he accidentally knocked the pickup truck off the jack and onto his son.

First, Karl is heard saying on police interrogation tapes obtained by ABC News that he had found his son’s body earlier but didn’t call police.

“I found him dead,” Karl said.  “I f—ing panicked. I don’t know. I don’t know.”

When investigators asked Karl what he meant when he said he “panicked,” Karl said, “I left him.”

During the interrogation, Karl complained of feeling sick and needing pain medication, saying he has panic attacks. But finally he told police he had been there when the truck fell on his son.

“I opened the truck door because I had to get inside to move the linkage for the f—ing truck, and when I did, it tipped, and it just, whoosh, f—ing fell over,” Karl said in the interrogation tapes.

But while he did admit he caused the truck to fall on his son during the police interrogation, investigators said Karl maintains it was an accident.

“He did admit that he caused the truck to fall on his so.  He did admit that he left his son on the floor dying, but he never admitted that it was a planned, deliberate act,” said Seneca County Lt. Investigator John Cleere.

Levi’s death was initially ruled an accident in 2008. Police said Karl collected a $700,000 life insurance payout after the incident and that Levi had signed a handwritten will before his death, leaving everything to his father. But at the time, authorities said they didn’t know about the life insurance policy or the will.

“The officers at the scene didn’t see anything out of the ordinary,” Cleere said.  “They saw what appeared to be two grieving parents and what appeared to be an accident.”

Police said Cindy had her suspicions about Levi’s death, especially after she said she learned that Karl had taken out a life insurance policy on her worth $1.2 million.

But Levi’s death was not the first family tragedy in Karl’s life. His first wife Christina, who is also Levi’s mother, died in a 1991 house fire, for which investigators said Karl collected a $200,000 life insurance payout. At the time, Christina and Karl were living in Murphys, Calif., outside of San Francisco, with their three young children. Levi was just 5 years old at the time, and his two sisters were 4 and 7.

According to Christina’s sister Collette Bousson, Christina and Karl were struggling financially and tensions rose in their relationship.

Karl told police that Christina was in a bathroom when some kerosene that had spilled suddenly erupted in flames. He got the kids out, but Christina was trapped in the fire.  The window to the bathroom had been boarded up with 17 nails.

Karl told investigators the window pane had broken, so he had temporarily covered the window to keep out the cold and police ruled it an accidental fire. Christina’s family had their suspicions, but Bousson said, for the good of the children, they put their best face on things.

“I had to set aside all of my suspicions,” she said.  “I had to set aside everything that could have been a roadblock for me.  Because I was absolutely going to make sure those kids knew their mother.”

Karl moved across the country to New York State and got remarried, this time to Cindy.  Even when Bousson and her family heard that Karl’s New York barn in Seneca County, N.Y., insured for $90,000, had burned down, she said they held their tongue.

But all that changed, Bousson said, the day she found out Levi was dead.

“I knew Karl did it,” she said. “I didn’t know what he had to gain.  But I knew he did it.”

Bousson said she tried to warn Cindy, but she wouldn’t listen.

“We made it very clear that — that she should probably be careful,” Bousson said.  “Because we felt that she needed to know that there was a lot of suspicions around the fire in Murphys.”

Thanks to a tip from an unnamed family member, New York and California authorities re-opened the investigations into both Levi and Christina’s deaths. That’s when Cleere got involved for the first time and started checking out the long string of what he said was suspicious incidents connected to Karl.

“It’s extremely unlikely that someone would have that many tragic events a few weeks after they obtain exorbitantly high insurance policies,” Cleere said.

According to the prosecution’s theories, Karl killed his son and first wife for the insurance money.

Karl has pleaded not guilty to the second-degree murder charges for his son’s death and denies any wrongdoing in Christina’s death.  The judge has ruled that the jury will be allowed to hear the recorded conversation he had with his wife, Cindy, and the videotaped interrogation.

Karl’s lawyer Larry Kasperek, speaking on his client’s behalf, said he respectfully disagrees with the court’s recent decision to allow the jury to hear the recorded conversations his client had with his wife and the videotaped police interrogation.

Karl will go to trial for the murder of his son on Oct. 21.

The district attorney in California’s Calaveras County told ABC News that her office is now actively investigating Christina’s death as a homicide, and could not comment on an active investigation.

Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio

SUBMIT A CORRECTION