Long-Term Jobless Benefits a 'Lifeline' Ending Saturday - East Idaho News
News

Long-Term Jobless Benefits a ‘Lifeline’ Ending Saturday

  Published at

ABC kathy biscotti jef 131227 16x9 992?  SQUARESPACE CACHEVERSION=1388176513633ABC News(WASHINGTON) — Kathy Biscotti is in a “panic,” she says just hours before her federal unemployment benefits — her “lifeline” — will end.

“I have no savings. I went through all my savings. [The benefits] pay the rent and groceries and utilities, maybe if I’m lucky. If there’s enough left,” the Baltimore mother says of her $332 a week in unemployment insurance. “Sometimes, we have to have Oodles of Noodles for dinner or skip meals. We’ve done a lot of skipping meals since this all started. We went from three meals a day to two meals to sometimes just one meal a day.”

Biscotti, 51, is one of the estimated 1.3 million long-term unemployed workers who will lose their federal emergency unemployment benefits Saturday. The benefits, which many Republicans oppose unless the costs are offset in other parts of the budget, were left out of the bipartisan federal budget agreement reached this month.

The federal emergency benefits, which kick in after state jobless aid expires at 26 weeks, have been extended 11 times before. This would be the first time the program lapses since it was signed in 2008 by President George W. Bush.

Senate Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, say renewing the long-term insurance will be an urgent priority when they return from break Jan. 6. The Senate is expected to vote on a three-month extension, but Biscotti worries about keeping a roof over her head in the meantime.

She’s “flabbergasted, appalled, disgusted” that Congress went home before extending the benefits.

“They go home to their wonderful, expensive, lavish Holiday celebrations and [they are] having a good old time and they’re not worried a bit about us,” Biscotti, out of work for six months, said at her small apartment in Baltimore. “They don’t care about us, they don’t care about us at all.

Biscotti has been out of work since June when she was laid off from a real estate company. She spends at least five hours a day on a laptop in her bedroom applying for jobs and believes she has applied for between 200 and 300 jobs, with 20 interviews, including one company that called her back four times.

“I’m just totally overwhelmed with — depression kicks in,” Biscotti said, surrounded by photos of her two sons and granddaughter. “Fear is the hugest factor. I don’t want to have to end up living under a bridge. I don’t want to have to go to a women’s shelter. I’ve worked my whole life. I’ve worked since I was 14 years old, always taken care of myself and now I feel like I may not be able to take care of myself anymore.”

Biscotti spent most of her life working as a waitress, but she said she wanted out of the restaurant industry in 2004 and took an office assistant position at Morgan Stanley. She was laid off in 2008 and it took her two years to find her position at the real estate company. She worries now that the combination of her age and being out of work for more than six months means she will never get a job.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has said he is open to extending benefits, but he wants the estimated $25 billion price tag paid for. Other Republicans, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., have spoken against extending long-term jobless benefits beyond what is already paid for by the states.

Paul told Fox News Sunday earlier this month “while it seems good, it actually does a disservice to the people you’re trying to help.”

“I do support unemployment benefits for the 26 weeks that they’re paid for. If you extend it beyond that, you do a disservice to these workers,” Paul said. “When you allow people to be on unemployment insurance for 99 weeks, you’re causing them to become part of this perpetual unemployed group in our economy.”

In the meantime, Democrats are increasing the pressure on the issue. At the president’s final news conference of the year before he left for his Christmas vacation Dec. 20, he said of the lapsing of benefits, “I think we’re a better country than that. We don’t abandon each other when times are tough.”

This week, Sen. Jack Reed, D-RI, and Rep. Sandy Levin, the highest ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, held a conference call demanding Congress extend the benefits as soon as they get back.

Levin called the expiration “like being hit by an economic hurricane.”

“This is not a program that people are leaving good jobs, or not looking for jobs because they are doing very well,” Reed said Thursday. “From a human level, cutting certainly 1.3 million Americans’ lifeline, and there will be more in this month, it doesn’t make any sense and it’s not something that we should be doing.”

Reed, along with Nevada Republican Sen. Dean Heller, have proposed a bill that would extend these benefits for three months without a cost offset.

“I certainly hope that all my colleagues will respond to these two basic facts — one this is the fair and right thing to do for our constituents who worked hard and just want the chance to work hard again,” Reed said. “And two, it’s just the right thing to do for our economy.”

The liberal group Americans United for Change is also out with a Christmas-themed television ad slamming Republicans for protecting the “richest one percent” and accuses the GOP of “stripp[ing] 1.3 million Americans of jobless benefits — folks who want to work, but cannot find a job — kicking them to the curb during Christmas.”

“So to the 1.3 million Americans losing benefits, Merry Christmas from the GOP,” the narrator says in the ad running on national cable. “It’s wrong to leave more than a million Americans behind. Tell Republicans: Restore unemployment benefits now.”

Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio

SUBMIT A CORRECTION