Teacher pay talks play out behind the scenes - East Idaho News
Local

Teacher pay talks play out behind the scenes

  Published at

(Courtesy Idaho Education News)

BOISE — With educators becoming anxious, top lawmakers said Wednesday that legislation to boost teacher pay is imminent.

House Education Committee Chairman Reed DeMordaunt, R-Eagle, said lawmakers and education groups continue to go through negotiations and “mathematical exercises” to flesh out a plan that can enjoy widespread support.

But as of Wednesday afternoon, a deal had yet to surface.

“I am hopeful that we may see something this week,” DeMordaunt said. “This is not a guarantee, but we may see something by Friday.”

For weeks, lawmakers and state officials have met individually and in small groups behind the scenes trying to draft a bill and strike an agreement. Gov. Butch Otter’s staff, including education liaison Marilyn Whitney, have been involved, as have Superintendent of Public Instruction Sherri Ybarra and her special assistant, former state Sen. Tim Corder.

Representatives of the Idaho Education Association, Idaho Association of School Administrators and Idaho School Boards Association have also been at the table.

However, IEA and IASA members said their role has been diminished in recent weeks, and they are starting to question whether a deal can be reached.

“I think we’re running out of time to get something, but our goal is to get policymakers and stakeholders something we both find acceptable,” IASA Executive Director Rob Winslow said.

IEA President Penni Cyr echoed Winslow’s comments.

“I will tell you that we have not been very involved at all,” Cyr said. “It’s been quite a while since we talked with any of them, but the stakeholders have been working together on our ideas, etc.”

Stakeholders are concerned, for several reasons.

The Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee is tentatively scheduled to set the school budget in two weeks, on March 12. Using past legislative sessions as a rule of thumb, budget-writers are reluctant to add new programs in a budget if it has not already passed at least the House or Senate.

Using the budget schedule as a rough indicator, lawmakers could be poised to adjourn the session March 27 – at which point all bets would be off until 2016 if a teacher pay plan hasn’t materialized.

Representatives of the IEA and other stakeholder groups convened a meeting Tuesday with House Speaker Scott Bedke, R-Oakley, to discuss teacher pay and several other education issues.

In an interview with Idaho Education News Wednesday, Bedke said he told the parties “to go back to the negotiation tables and iron something out that everybody could be proud of and we could all be in favor of.”

Bedke stressed that lawmakers won’t go home until they address teacher salaries.

“We are not going to use the lateness of the session as an excuse to not move or a reason to not move on this issue,” Bedke said. “I have confidence in Chairman DeMordaunt to handle his committee and he knows the importance of this issue. I expect him to come with a bill soon.”

DeMordaunt also said a significant increase in teacher pay is his No. 1 priority for the session. A bill to raise teacher pay has been written, but revisions are ongoing.

When a bill surfaces, it is likely to do so in the House Education Committee.

What to expect in terms of teacher pay

A couple of potential blueprints for teacher pay increases have surfaced. The most high profile is the $150 million to $175 million career ladder plan approved by the State Board of Education in September. That plan, which sprang out of the 2013 recommendations from Otter’s Task Force for Improving Education, would raise minimum teacher salaries to $40,000 over five years. At the same time, so-called master teacher salaries would increase to $58,000 by 2019. The career ladder would replace the state’s existing salary reimbursement grid, based on a teacher’s education attainment and years of experience.

Meanwhile, Ybarra has called for a slower approach. For next year, she favors funding 3 percent raises for teachers. Ybarra also wants to initiate a small pilot program to test out the career ladder among a small group of school districts or charter schools.

“Three percent across the board is our recommendation,” Ybarra said Tuesday. “The school districts, when they participate in the pilot project, they get to come up with what that looks like.”

DeMordaunt and Senate Education Committee Chairman Dean Mortimer, R-Idaho Falls, appear to favor aspects of the full career ladder. Mortimer discussed three pay levels: an initial salary level for teachers in their first three years, followed by professional and master teacher levels. This is roughly in line with the concept of State Board’s career ladder plan.

Otter also backs the career ladder and called for spending $31.9 million more on teacher pay next year – which includes bringing minimum salaries up from $31,750 to $32,800.

“(My budget recommendation) provides more funding for teacher training and professional development, and a significant infusion of money for teacher compensation under the new tiered licensure and career ladder proposed by the State Board of Education,” Otter said on Jan. 12.

The State Board’s career ladder may be a blueprint, but Bedke said the final plan may be different.

“Taking nothing away from (the task force and State Board), there is arguably still maybe a little bit of work to do in the eyes of the education committees, so that is what we are doing,” Bedke said.

Lawmakers appear to still be debating the exact amount of money to devote to teacher pay and how to dole it out, which may explain why a bill has yet to surface.

“All of the time and effort we have put forth, by all parties involved, has been to try and build some consensus in legislation so we go out of the starting gate,” Mortimer said.

At this point, that starting gate appears to be within sight.

“We need to get something out there,” DeMordaunt said. “And the sooner the better.”

This article was written by Idaho Education News Reporter Clark Corbin and is used here with permission. The article originally appeared here.

SUBMIT A CORRECTION