• Wed 82°F / 55°F
Home » Archives by category » Health News (Page 4)

Woman Says She Was Denied Job Due to Peanut Allergy

Woman Says She Was Denied Job Due to Peanut Allergy

Medioimages/Photodisc/Thinkstock(BOSTON) — A Massachusetts woman is now without a job after she claims she lost a job offer due to her severe peanut allergy.Kameela Coleman said she was scheduled to start her job working as scheduling coordinator at a dental outpatient clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital this week. However, before she started the job, she disclosed that she had a peanut allergy, which could result in throat swelling and hives.After telling hospital administration about her allergy, she said she was asked multiple questions about the severity of her allergy and what conditions could possibly set off a deadly reaction. After a long interview, Coleman said the administration rescinded the job offer telling her they could not offer her a safe work environment, she said.“I kept saying to them I wasn’t asking them to make any accommodations for me,” Coleman said.However, in a statement, hospital officials wrote ABC News that the decision was made out of safety concerns for Coleman.Coleman, 37, said she has not decided if she will pursue legal avenues but experts said the case shows the grey area for employers and employees when dealing with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment.Experts said that the severity of the allergy could determine if Coleman would be legally covered under the law. Even with a severe allergy, employers can argue that hiring a person with a disability would result in an “undue hardship” for the employer.
Daniel Schwartz, an employment lawyer at the Shipman and Goodwin law firm and publisher of the Connecticut Employment law blog, said the ADA could be applied to a severe food allergy, but that the law is really designed to allow the employer and employee to talk about reasonable accommodations.“If an employee with a peanut allergy was looking to be hired to work in the warehouse of a peanut butter manufacturer, that may not be realistic,” said Schwartz, who emphasized he was speaking generally because he was not working with Coleman. “A hospital may have some concerns as well. But allergies should be handled on a case by case basis. Just because an employee has a food allergy, doesn’t mean that they can’t be accommodated in some instances.”Michael Spigler, vice president of education at Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE), said there are ways for employers to accommodate workers with severe allergies so that no one needs to resort to legal challenges.“While not commonplace, we do occasionally hear about difficult workplace challenges that adults with food allergies experience,” said Spigler. “Employers can accommodate individuals with food allergies in a variety of ways, from conducting training sessions to educate staff about food allergies and anaphylaxis, to providing designated space in break room areas for an employee’s food, to making adjustments in office events that involve food to ensure the employee can participate”Children’s Hospital officials said they are an equal opportunity employer and do not “tolerate employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities.””As the top pediatric hospital in the world, workplace safety is extremely important to us. As Ms. Coleman stated, she has a severe peanut allergy,” hospital officials told ABC News in a statement. “Currently in the U.S. alone there are 3 million people who suffer from peanut allergies which can be life threatening. At BCH the safety for our patients and employees is a guiding principle.”The hospital administration also said they were working with Coleman to resolve the matter, though Coleman told ABC News she had not spoken to anyone at the hospital as of Tuesday morning and has not sought legal representation.Coleman said she’s frustrated because her allergies have not been a major issue at previous jobs.For 13 years, Coleman worked at Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital, she said, where she worked as a secretary in the Intensive Care Unit, and never had a serious problem with her allergy. She said if people were eating peanuts too close she would sometimes leave the floor because she felt nauseous.“I recognize people eat peanuts when I’m not there,” said Coleman. “I wipe down my phone and keyboard [at work]. It’s also to protect me.”Coleman said she carries an epinephrine auto-injector, commonly known as EpiPen, with her at all times, but has only used it once after accidentally ingesting peanuts at a restaurant. The smell of peanuts can make her nauseous, she said, but she can usually leave the immediate area.
During one visit to Boston Children’s Hospital to meet with occupational health officials, a hospital worker was eating peanuts nearby. Coleman said she just moved away and was fine.Coleman said she had been excited to work at Boston Children’s Hospital, where she would typically work a day shift and get to spend more time with her 15-month-old daughter.After getting the initial job offer, Coleman said she gave her notice at Beth Israel and enrolled her daughter in daycare near Boston Children’s Hospital. Now, her daughter is at daycare all day, as Coleman waits at home hoping the hospital administration will reconsider, she said.Coleman said she has yet to hear from Boston Children’s Hospital about any possible accommodations or changes that would allow her to work in the building.“What I really wanted was my job,” said Coleman. “If they came to me and said it was a mistake … it’s something we can work with. I’d be at work right now. There would be no issue.”
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Woman Says She Was Denied Job Due to Peanut Allergy

Woman Says She Was Denied Job Due to Peanut Allergy

Medioimages/Photodisc/Thinkstock(BOSTON) — A Massachusetts woman is now without a job after she claims she lost a job offer due to her severe peanut allergy.Kameela Coleman said she was scheduled to start her job working as scheduling coordinator at a dental outpatient clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital this week. However, before she started the job, she disclosed that she had a peanut allergy, which could result in throat swelling and hives.After telling hospital administration about her allergy, she said she was asked multiple questions about the severity of her allergy and what conditions could possibly set off a deadly reaction. After a long interview, Coleman said the administration rescinded the job offer telling her they could not offer her a safe work environment, she said.“I kept saying to them I wasn’t asking them to make any accommodations for me,” Coleman said.However, in a statement, hospital officials wrote ABC News that the decision was made out of safety concerns for Coleman.Coleman, 37, said she has not decided if she will pursue legal avenues but experts said the case shows the grey area for employers and employees when dealing with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment.Experts said that the severity of the allergy could determine if Coleman would be legally covered under the law. Even with a severe allergy, employers can argue that hiring a person with a disability would result in an “undue hardship” for the employer.
Daniel Schwartz, an employment lawyer at the Shipman and Goodwin law firm and publisher of the Connecticut Employment law blog, said the ADA could be applied to a severe food allergy, but that the law is really designed to allow the employer and employee to talk about reasonable accommodations.“If an employee with a peanut allergy was looking to be hired to work in the warehouse of a peanut butter manufacturer, that may not be realistic,” said Schwartz, who emphasized he was speaking generally because he was not working with Coleman. “A hospital may have some concerns as well. But allergies should be handled on a case by case basis. Just because an employee has a food allergy, doesn’t mean that they can’t be accommodated in some instances.”Michael Spigler, vice president of education at Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE), said there are ways for employers to accommodate workers with severe allergies so that no one needs to resort to legal challenges.“While not commonplace, we do occasionally hear about difficult workplace challenges that adults with food allergies experience,” said Spigler. “Employers can accommodate individuals with food allergies in a variety of ways, from conducting training sessions to educate staff about food allergies and anaphylaxis, to providing designated space in break room areas for an employee’s food, to making adjustments in office events that involve food to ensure the employee can participate”Children’s Hospital officials said they are an equal opportunity employer and do not “tolerate employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities.””As the top pediatric hospital in the world, workplace safety is extremely important to us. As Ms. Coleman stated, she has a severe peanut allergy,” hospital officials told ABC News in a statement. “Currently in the U.S. alone there are 3 million people who suffer from peanut allergies which can be life threatening. At BCH the safety for our patients and employees is a guiding principle.”The hospital administration also said they were working with Coleman to resolve the matter, though Coleman told ABC News she had not spoken to anyone at the hospital as of Tuesday morning and has not sought legal representation.Coleman said she’s frustrated because her allergies have not been a major issue at previous jobs.For 13 years, Coleman worked at Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital, she said, where she worked as a secretary in the Intensive Care Unit, and never had a serious problem with her allergy. She said if people were eating peanuts too close she would sometimes leave the floor because she felt nauseous.“I recognize people eat peanuts when I’m not there,” said Coleman. “I wipe down my phone and keyboard [at work]. It’s also to protect me.”Coleman said she carries an epinephrine auto-injector, commonly known as EpiPen, with her at all times, but has only used it once after accidentally ingesting peanuts at a restaurant. The smell of peanuts can make her nauseous, she said, but she can usually leave the immediate area.
During one visit to Boston Children’s Hospital to meet with occupational health officials, a hospital worker was eating peanuts nearby. Coleman said she just moved away and was fine.Coleman said she had been excited to work at Boston Children’s Hospital, where she would typically work a day shift and get to spend more time with her 15-month-old daughter.After getting the initial job offer, Coleman said she gave her notice at Beth Israel and enrolled her daughter in daycare near Boston Children’s Hospital. Now, her daughter is at daycare all day, as Coleman waits at home hoping the hospital administration will reconsider, she said.Coleman said she has yet to hear from Boston Children’s Hospital about any possible accommodations or changes that would allow her to work in the building.“What I really wanted was my job,” said Coleman. “If they came to me and said it was a mistake … it’s something we can work with. I’d be at work right now. There would be no issue.”
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Woman Says She Was Denied Job Due to Peanut Allergy

Woman Says She Was Denied Job Due to Peanut Allergy

Medioimages/Photodisc/Thinkstock(BOSTON) — A Massachusetts woman is now without a job after she claims she lost a job offer due to her severe peanut allergy.Kameela Coleman said she was scheduled to start her job working as scheduling coordinator at a dental outpatient clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital this week. However, before she started the job, she disclosed that she had a peanut allergy, which could result in throat swelling and hives.After telling hospital administration about her allergy, she said she was asked multiple questions about the severity of her allergy and what conditions could possibly set off a deadly reaction. After a long interview, Coleman said the administration rescinded the job offer telling her they could not offer her a safe work environment, she said.“I kept saying to them I wasn’t asking them to make any accommodations for me,” Coleman said.However, in a statement, hospital officials wrote ABC News that the decision was made out of safety concerns for Coleman.Coleman, 37, said she has not decided if she will pursue legal avenues but experts said the case shows the grey area for employers and employees when dealing with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment.Experts said that the severity of the allergy could determine if Coleman would be legally covered under the law. Even with a severe allergy, employers can argue that hiring a person with a disability would result in an “undue hardship” for the employer.
Daniel Schwartz, an employment lawyer at the Shipman and Goodwin law firm and publisher of the Connecticut Employment law blog, said the ADA could be applied to a severe food allergy, but that the law is really designed to allow the employer and employee to talk about reasonable accommodations.“If an employee with a peanut allergy was looking to be hired to work in the warehouse of a peanut butter manufacturer, that may not be realistic,” said Schwartz, who emphasized he was speaking generally because he was not working with Coleman. “A hospital may have some concerns as well. But allergies should be handled on a case by case basis. Just because an employee has a food allergy, doesn’t mean that they can’t be accommodated in some instances.”Michael Spigler, vice president of education at Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE), said there are ways for employers to accommodate workers with severe allergies so that no one needs to resort to legal challenges.“While not commonplace, we do occasionally hear about difficult workplace challenges that adults with food allergies experience,” said Spigler. “Employers can accommodate individuals with food allergies in a variety of ways, from conducting training sessions to educate staff about food allergies and anaphylaxis, to providing designated space in break room areas for an employee’s food, to making adjustments in office events that involve food to ensure the employee can participate”Children’s Hospital officials said they are an equal opportunity employer and do not “tolerate employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities.””As the top pediatric hospital in the world, workplace safety is extremely important to us. As Ms. Coleman stated, she has a severe peanut allergy,” hospital officials told ABC News in a statement. “Currently in the U.S. alone there are 3 million people who suffer from peanut allergies which can be life threatening. At BCH the safety for our patients and employees is a guiding principle.”The hospital administration also said they were working with Coleman to resolve the matter, though Coleman told ABC News she had not spoken to anyone at the hospital as of Tuesday morning and has not sought legal representation.Coleman said she’s frustrated because her allergies have not been a major issue at previous jobs.For 13 years, Coleman worked at Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital, she said, where she worked as a secretary in the Intensive Care Unit, and never had a serious problem with her allergy. She said if people were eating peanuts too close she would sometimes leave the floor because she felt nauseous.“I recognize people eat peanuts when I’m not there,” said Coleman. “I wipe down my phone and keyboard [at work]. It’s also to protect me.”Coleman said she carries an epinephrine auto-injector, commonly known as EpiPen, with her at all times, but has only used it once after accidentally ingesting peanuts at a restaurant. The smell of peanuts can make her nauseous, she said, but she can usually leave the immediate area.
During one visit to Boston Children’s Hospital to meet with occupational health officials, a hospital worker was eating peanuts nearby. Coleman said she just moved away and was fine.Coleman said she had been excited to work at Boston Children’s Hospital, where she would typically work a day shift and get to spend more time with her 15-month-old daughter.After getting the initial job offer, Coleman said she gave her notice at Beth Israel and enrolled her daughter in daycare near Boston Children’s Hospital. Now, her daughter is at daycare all day, as Coleman waits at home hoping the hospital administration will reconsider, she said.Coleman said she has yet to hear from Boston Children’s Hospital about any possible accommodations or changes that would allow her to work in the building.“What I really wanted was my job,” said Coleman. “If they came to me and said it was a mistake … it’s something we can work with. I’d be at work right now. There would be no issue.”
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

A Handful of Scientific Facts About Lefties

A Handful of Scientific Facts About Lefties

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Wednesday is International Left-Handers Day.
On the one hand, let’s celebrate the 10 percent or so of the population that favor their left hands for important tasks. On the other hand, this is the perfect time to toss out five little-known scientific facts about lefties:
Lefties can throw a punch
When researchers at the University of Montpellier in France surveyed nine primitive societies in five separate continents, they found a higher percentage of lefties translated into more frequent violent encounters. Furthermore, lefties often had the upper hand in a fight because of the element of surprise. No one expects a punch to come out of left field. This same sneak attack seems to cross over into a sports advantage, the researchers speculated, especially in sports like boxing, tennis and fencing where opponents go head-to-head.
Animals have a paw preference, too
One British study, among others, found that about 40 percent of cats are southpaws, with an additional 10 percent happy to swat a ball of yarn with either paw. Another Brit study found paw preference in dogs is split about evenly. It seems Fido takes sides with his tail, too. Last year, an Italian study suggested that when dogs wag their tails from right to left, it signifies happiness. Wagging from left to right demonstrates displeasure.
We love leftie leaders
The fact that five of our last seven commanders in chief have been lefties is probably a coincidence. However, as one recent Dutch investigation suggested, right-handed politicians may want to fake it to the left. Left-handed people tend to raise their left hands when speaking about something good whereas right handers tend to raise their right hand. But in televised debates, when a person raises his or her right hand, it will appear on a viewer’s left, just as if the person was sitting in a chair in front of them. For this reason, viewers subconsciously interpret left-hand movements as good and right-hand movements as bad.
Lefties use their brains differently
Lefties may use their noggins slightly differently from righties, the research suggests. For example, one Australian study found left-handed people access both hemispheres of their brain more readily than right-handed people, who tend to be left hemisphere-dominant. There are advantages and disadvantages to using the brain with a more even distribution. Some studies find lefties to be more creative and more resilient when recovering from strokes. However, other studies imply lefties are more susceptible to a ttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia and other mental disorders.
Lefties are often left out
Scissors and computer mice were designed without a second thought for lefties. That’s inconvenient, but leaving left handed people out of the equation in scientific research may have far-reaching consequences, Dutch scientists have said. Writing in the journal Nature earlier this year, the scientists pointed out that left-handed people have different brains and genes from right-handed people, yet are rarely included as study subjects. As a result, we may be missing out on important information in everything from neuroscience to genetic disorders, the scientists said.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

A Handful of Scientific Facts About Lefties

A Handful of Scientific Facts About Lefties

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Wednesday is International Left-Handers Day.
On the one hand, let’s celebrate the 10 percent or so of the population that favor their left hands for important tasks. On the other hand, this is the perfect time to toss out five little-known scientific facts about lefties:
Lefties can throw a punch
When researchers at the University of Montpellier in France surveyed nine primitive societies in five separate continents, they found a higher percentage of lefties translated into more frequent violent encounters. Furthermore, lefties often had the upper hand in a fight because of the element of surprise. No one expects a punch to come out of left field. This same sneak attack seems to cross over into a sports advantage, the researchers speculated, especially in sports like boxing, tennis and fencing where opponents go head-to-head.
Animals have a paw preference, too
One British study, among others, found that about 40 percent of cats are southpaws, with an additional 10 percent happy to swat a ball of yarn with either paw. Another Brit study found paw preference in dogs is split about evenly. It seems Fido takes sides with his tail, too. Last year, an Italian study suggested that when dogs wag their tails from right to left, it signifies happiness. Wagging from left to right demonstrates displeasure.
We love leftie leaders
The fact that five of our last seven commanders in chief have been lefties is probably a coincidence. However, as one recent Dutch investigation suggested, right-handed politicians may want to fake it to the left. Left-handed people tend to raise their left hands when speaking about something good whereas right handers tend to raise their right hand. But in televised debates, when a person raises his or her right hand, it will appear on a viewer’s left, just as if the person was sitting in a chair in front of them. For this reason, viewers subconsciously interpret left-hand movements as good and right-hand movements as bad.
Lefties use their brains differently
Lefties may use their noggins slightly differently from righties, the research suggests. For example, one Australian study found left-handed people access both hemispheres of their brain more readily than right-handed people, who tend to be left hemisphere-dominant. There are advantages and disadvantages to using the brain with a more even distribution. Some studies find lefties to be more creative and more resilient when recovering from strokes. However, other studies imply lefties are more susceptible to a ttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia and other mental disorders.
Lefties are often left out
Scissors and computer mice were designed without a second thought for lefties. That’s inconvenient, but leaving left handed people out of the equation in scientific research may have far-reaching consequences, Dutch scientists have said. Writing in the journal Nature earlier this year, the scientists pointed out that left-handed people have different brains and genes from right-handed people, yet are rarely included as study subjects. As a result, we may be missing out on important information in everything from neuroscience to genetic disorders, the scientists said.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Are You an ‘Um’ or ‘Uh’ Person?

Are You an ‘Um’ or ‘Uh’ Person?

Stockbyte/Thinkstock(PHILADELPHIA) — Uh…um…why do people use so much language filler when they speak?Before answering that question, University of Pennsylvania linguist Mark Liberman wanted to determine just who uses these filler words.After analyzing 14,000 phone conservations by 12,000 people in the U.S., Liberman says men are more prone to say “uh” while women prefer to use “um.” However, he also noted some variations. For instance, men won’t say “uh” as often when speaking to women than other guys while women will drop in more “ums” when talking to males than other females.Meanwhile, the use of “um” is about the same for younger women and younger men.According to Liberman, our choice of fillers, that also include “like,” “you know” and “I mean” is based on gender, intelligence and language fluency.Another finding: “um” comes in handy when people are trying to figure out what to say next while “uh” fills in the gap as we decide how to say it.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Scientists Know If Your Coffee’s Been Tampered With

Scientists Know If Your Coffee’s Been Tampered With

iStock/Thinkstock(LONDRINA, Brazil) — If your coffee starts tasting differently, blame it on wood, twigs, husks and even clumps of earth. With droughts and plant diseases affecting coffee supplies in countries like Brazil, coffee makers are beginning to dilute their beverages with filler.That’s not good news for regular coffee drinkers but there is help on the horizon.Suzana Lucy Nixdorf and researchers at State University of Londrina in Brazil say they’re close to developing a test that can pretty much spot any filler used by unscrupulous coffee makers with 95 percent accuracy.Beside the fillers already mentioned, other additives include barley, wheat, soybeans, rice, beans, acai seed, brown sugar or starch syrup, which once roasted, can be difficult to ascertain through conventional means.Nixdorf says her team uses liquid chromatography that has proven effective in detecting coffee that has been tampered with. Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Invasive Breast Cancer Risk Lessens by Walking

Invasive Breast Cancer Risk Lessens by Walking

iStock/Thinkstock(LONDON) — Walking isn’t the most strenuous exercise one can do but that doesn’t matter as long as it provides a life-saving benefit.According to French researcher Agnès Fournier, women who reach the postmenopausal stage of their lives can reduce their risk of developing invasive breast cancer by ten percent if they walk four hours or more weekly.In a report for the World Cancer Research Fund, Fournier and her team investigated the lifestyle habits of 59,000 older women over a 12-year span with follow-ups every two years.Fournier said that the outcome was consistent with previous research that there’s a reduced cancer risk among women following menopause so long as they were involved in regular physical activity such as walking at least 30 minutes a day.The study cautioned women that it was important to sustain a routine of walking because those women who stop it don’t experience the same decreased risk for invasive breast cancer.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Unmarried Women Giving Birth to Fewer Children

Unmarried Women Giving Birth to Fewer Children

Creatas/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the rate of childbirth in unmarried woman was lower in 2013 than in any year since 2008.According to data published by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, part of the cause for the statistical drop is likely a large decrease in teen pregnancy. The CDC report showed a 30-percent dip in pregnancy for girls ages 15 to 17, and a 26-percent drop in pregnancy for 18- and 19-year-old girls.Teens, the CDC said, had the largest percentage drop in pregnancy among any age group between 2007 and 2012.In adults, unmarried black and Hispanic women saw larger decreases in childbirth rates than white women. Between 2007 and 2012, the rate of childbearing among unmarried black women fell by 11 percent, while the same figure for Hispanic women dropped by 28 percent. Unmarried white women saw just a six-percent drop in childbearing rate.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

FDA Approves Donor Lung Preservation Device

FDA Approves Donor Lung Preservation Device

iStockphoto/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday approved a donor lung preservation device that could result in more viable lung transplants.In a statement on Tuesday, the FDA said that it had approved the XVIVO Perfusion System with STEEN Solution — a device that it says preserves donated lungs “that do not initially meet the standard criteria for lung transplantation but may be transplantable if there is more time to observe and evaluate the organ’s function.” The FDA notes that 1,754 lung transplants were performed in 2012, but 1,616 potential recipients remained on a waiting list for lung transplants at the end of that year.Christy Foreman, director of the Office of Device Evaluation at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, called the device “innovative,” noting that it “addresses a critical public health need.”By keeping potential donor lungs at normal body temperatures and continuously flushing the lung tissue with a sterile fluid solution, the XVIVO Perfusion System preserves the lungs and removes waste products while doctors can determine if the lung is viable for transplant.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Sleep Drugs May Not Be Effective for Shift Workers, Researchers Say

Sleep Drugs May Not Be Effective for Shift Workers, Researchers Say

iStockphoto/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Researchers say that workers who take popular sleep medications after working a night shift may not be receiving the benefits they hope for.According to a Cochrane Review analysis of 4,651 past studies, melatonin only increased the average length of sleep time after a night shift by approximately 24 minutes. Additionally, the extra sleep workers gained was often low-quality sleep.Other drugs, meant to help improve a worker’s level of alertness when they are awake, including armodafinil and modafinil, were discovered to be slightly more effective than a placebo in decreasing sleepiness. However, researchers say, the effects of those drugs did not last an entire shift — and side effects for use of both drugs get worse with higher doses.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Scratch Hand Sanitizers Off Your Back-to-School List, Study Suggests

Scratch Hand Sanitizers Off Your Back-to-School List, Study Suggests

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Hand sanitizers are heavily marketed to parents in the weeks leading up to the first day of school. But they may be useless when it comes to preventing school absences due to illnesses, according to a new study.Researchers in New Zealand observed 2,500 children (from 68 schools) for five months and found that kids who used hand sanitizers in their classrooms had an equal number of sick days — about 1 in every 100 children per day — as those who did not.All of the kids in the study received a 30-minute educational lesson on hand washing and hygiene, while half also used hand sanitizers.Until recently, most studies of hand sanitizers in schools have been too small or too biased to answer the question of whether it really helps prevent illness. This new research may mean that as the school year begins, parents can rely on a little reminder about hand-washing habits and don’t necessarily have to stock up on the sanitizers.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Why Does Social Media Help Us Mourn?

Why Does Social Media Help Us Mourn?

iStock Editorial/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — It was as though millions of people personally knew Robin Williams. Tributes to the actor poured in on Facebook and Twitter from many people who never had the pleasure of meeting him but felt like they had through his work.The advent of social media has created a new way for people to come together and grieve, Dr. Pamela Rutledge, director of the Media Psychology Research Center, told ABC News.”One of the things we do when there is loss is we have funerals and we have wakes so people can get together and share that experience,” Rutledge said. “Social media is giving us a way to share that experience with a larger group.”The Oscar-winning actor and comedian died Monday in California of a suspected suicide. He was 63.Less than a day after his death, more than 7.3 million tweets have been sent mentioning Williams, according to Topsy, a social analytics company. Williams also remained a top trend on Facebook.”Robin Williams has made a huge mark on people through the length of his career, so people want to know they’re not alone in grieving,” Rutledge said. “They want to connect the way he made them feel connected and so social media is an obvious and natural way for people to express that.””It’s kind of nice, actually, that people who don’t know each other can express that and feel the sense of the reach that he had,” she said.Whether it was his charitable work that made us smile or his filmography that made us laugh, cry and think about the world, Williams was mourned on social media as millions of people grappled with the enormous loss together.”We see this when someone like Robin Williams or Michael Jackson or Whitney Houston passes away,” Rutledge said. “These are people who have had a profound effect on American culture and have a profound effect in a positive way.”
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Anatomy of a Shark Bite: How Doctors Tackle Gruesome Wounds

Anatomy of a Shark Bite: How Doctors Tackle Gruesome Wounds

Courtesy of Health First(NEW YORK) — Amy Tatsch was boogie boarding off the coast of Florida less than three months ago when she felt something bump her right leg. Hard.Just as it registered that there was a shark in the waist-deep water with her, she felt razor-sharp teeth rip away half of her calf.“I really didn’t think I was going to make it back out with the amount of blood I saw,” the 38-year-old mother of six told ABC News. “I thought I would end up passing out, or I thought the shark was going to come back and attack me and my brother.”Tatsch, whose 2-year-old twins were with her family on the beach, never saw the shark that bit her, but the rare encounter left her lower right leg almost unrecognizable. The bite had gone down to the bone. A shark expert later determined from the wound that it was a 6-foot bull shark that had attacked her.Somehow, she caught a wave into shore and shouted for help. She remembers being rushed to the hospital, but the next 13 days were a blur, she said.Dr. Daniel Segina, a traumatologist at Health First’s Holmes Regional Medical Center in Melbourne, Florida, said he’s treated about a dozen shark bites over the last 15 years he’s been practicing, but Tatsch’s was the worst.Most of his patients had shark bites to their legs, though a few were bitten on their hands, he said.“The lower leg is probably the most common one we see,” Segina told ABC News. “If you can imagine surfers sitting on surf boards, paddling in the water as they’re waiting for a wave to come. That’s usually when they get bitten.”Dr. Nicholas Namias, who famously treated shark attack victim Krishna Thompson in 2001, said trauma surgeons generally follow standard trauma guidelines when they get shark bite patients. Namias, medical director of Ryder Trauma Center at the University of Miami Health System, has treated two shark attack victims in his career.“You make sure there’s no ongoing bleeding and you repair what you can,” Namias said.Then, an anesthesiologist puts the patient to sleep so he can clean the wound, Segina said. Since a shark bite has been exposed to the bacteria-filled “marine environment,” doctors worry about contamination and infection, he said.But Segina doesn’t use chemicals or antibiotics to do the cleaning, he said.“Just sterile water,” he said. “For the most part, it’s been shown to be the most effective.”Tatsch said she felt no pain after the initial bite, but when she woke up from her the surgery, her leg hurt. She would later learn that she’d lost a chunk of her muscle, that her Achilles tendon had been torn on both ends, and that she needed a plasma transfusion.Despite Segina’s prompt surgery, Tatsch’s wound became infected.It would take five surgeries, more than 150 stitches and countless hours of physical therapy to get Tatsch walking again.She said she started walking for the first time without crutches only two weeks ago, but she has a limp and can’t go for too long without pain and swelling. Teeth marks and a deep indentation are visible on her calf, but she says she’s not interested in plastic surgery.As she spoke to ABC News, she was walking along the beach and collecting shells.“I have not been back on the boogie board,” she said. “But I have gone back in the water.”
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

The Flipside of a Funny Bone Can Be a Troubled Psyche

The Flipside of a Funny Bone Can Be a Troubled Psyche

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Robin Williams’ apparent suicide has put a spotlight on the dark side of comedy. Williams, like many comedians, lived with long-term depression and addiction.Experts say these mental illnesses are no laughing matter.“Comedy can often be a defensive posture against depression,” said Deborah Serani, a clinical psychologist who treats performers with depression and other mental health problems.Serani, author of the book, Living With Depression, said that for many comedians, humor is a “counter phobic” response to the darkness and sadness they feel. Their intelligence, she said, helps them put a funny spin on their despair.“They often wear what we call ‘the mask of depression,’ which helps them put on a more acceptable face to the world,” she said. “But behind that mask there is a terrible struggle going on. There is a stigma about depression and oftentimes the laughter distracts from feelings of weakness.”Williams spoke openly about his lifelong battle with addiction, alcoholism and depression. In 2006, he checked himself into rehab after a relapse, and then checked himself in again for undisclosed reasons last month.He is certainly not the only comedian who has ever lived with depression and addiction. Comedian Marc Maron has spoken publicly about having severe depression. So has stand-up comedian Jim Norton.
John Belushi, Chris Farley and Greg Giraldo all died of drug overdoses. And in 2007, Richard Jeni committed suicide by shooting himself in the face.The reason so many comedians are at risk for mental illness is because being funny is not the same thing as being happy, said Dr. Rami Kaminski, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University School of Medicine. He said he believes many comedians mine humor as a way to escape depression and anxiety.“It’s like someone who is afraid of heights but chooses to take up skydiving,” he said. “If they are funny all the time, maybe they will be able to feel a little bit better.”Dr. Michael Clarke, the vice chairman for clinical affairs and the Department of Psychology at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, said research shows that, in general, creativity and mental illness often go hand in hand.“People with a more creative side do seem to have a greater rate of mood disorders like depression and bipolar disorder,” he said. “We don’t know exactly why this is but it could have a biological basis in the emotional centers of the brain.”However, Clarke said, not every comedian is mentally ill. He added that mental illness usually hampers creativity — so that when someone is in a depressed state, they are often less productive.“Illness can inform someone’s work but when we are talking about mood disorders we are talking about disease states of the brain. Their thinking is impaired and they aren’t always capable of making good decisions,” he said.Kaminski said Williams may have been in this impaired frame of mind when he decided to commit suicide.“Many comedians tend to be depressed because they are trying to get out of their dark world by being funny,” he said. “But only those that are clinically depressed are at risk for committing suicide.”
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

WHO Says Use of Experimental Ebola Interventions Is Ethical

WHO Says Use of Experimental Ebola Interventions Is Ethical

Hemera/Thinkstock(GENEVA) — The World Health Organization has given the green light for the use of experimental Ebola treatments to combat the deadly virus or prevent it from spreading. “It is ethical to offer unregistered interventions as potential treatments or prevention,” WHO Assistant Director General Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny said.As West Africa is being hit with what the WHO calls the “largest, most severe and most complex outbreak of Ebola” in history, scientists have developed drugs and vaccines that could counter the virus, but sit only behind one obstacle — that these interventions have yet to be tested on humans.”This is an opportunity to right a wrong of history that it is only relatively recently, in the last decade, that researchers have begun investigating interventions for Ebola,” said WHO Assistant Director-General Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny.But the WHO says that provided certain conditions are met, the unproven interventions should be available options for patients. The conditions, or ethical criteria, include transparency about all aspects of care, informed consent, freedom of choice, confidentiality, respect for the person, preservation of dignity and involvement of the community.  The WHO panel of consultants tasked with assessing the ethical implications of using unproven interventions adds that there is a “moral obligation” to collect and share any data that is generated from the use of these drugs.While the two American health care workers who contracted the disease in Liberia have been given medications not yet tested on humans, the WHO panel has not specified which treatments it would condone or where the drugs should be sent.”We do not get involved into the discussion about who should get what drug at the moment,” Kieny said.The UN Health agency says over 1,000 West Africans have died as the outbreak continues to grow. Nearly 2,000 more cases have been recorded.Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Once a Cheater, Probably Always a Cheater

Once a Cheater, Probably Always a Cheater

iStock/Thinkstock(DENVER) — Cheating in a relationship happens. That’s just a fact of life. But if you’re the one who’s been betrayed and are more than willing to forgive and forget, you may want to rethink your decision.Kayla Knopp, a graduate student at the University of Denver, says that people who cheat are likely to do it over and over again.In fact, after interviewing nearly 500 unmarried people between 18 and 34, Knopp found that people who stray in one relationship are three-and-a-half times more likely to have an affair when they move on to another relationship.The researcher says this repeat behavior also pertains to aggressive acts such as “yelling, shouting, pushing and shoving,” a bad sign if ever there was one.According to Knopp, “We like to think that we can learn from our experiences and our mistakes, especially when it comes to love.” But as her small survey suggests, people should try to think less with their hearts and more with their brains.Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

LGBT Community Feels Less Connection to Religion than Others

LGBT Community Feels Less Connection to Religion than Others

David McNew/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) — A new Gallup poll says that only about one in four Americans who identify themselves as either lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender feel that religion is an important part of their daily lives.Being “highly religious” also means attending services weekly or almost every week.While 24 percent of the LGBT community put themselves in this category, just over four in 10 who are not LGBT say they are “highly religious.”The reason for this disparity, according to Gallup, may have to do with LGBT members not feeling welcome by the religious groups they want to be affiliated with. Also, there is also a greater concentration of LGBT people in cities where religion tends to be a less of priority than in the suburbs or rural America.The Gallup survey also reveals that two-thirds of LGBT adults identify with a particular religion, compared to 83 percent of non-LGBT respondents.Meanwhile 35 percent of LGBT adults say they are Protestant, far lower than more than 50 percent of the non-LGBT population.The survey involved more than 100,000 interviews with 3,242 adults saying they were lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Five Tips to Combat Flight Anxiety

Five Tips to Combat Flight Anxiety

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Do you have a fear of flying? You’re not alone.
Nearly 7 percent of people have what’s called aerophobia, according to Statistic Brain. And recent news events, including a yet-to-be found Malaysia Airlines flight and another Malaysia Airline plane shot down over Ukraine, killing 298 people, haven’t done much to ease those worries.But if the fear’s so bad you’re thinking about skipping your next vacation, don’t act too fast. Industry experts agree that, by and large, commercial air travel is very safe.CheapAir.com CEO Jeff Klee, who flies for a living, shared with ABC News his top five tips to combat flight anxiety:1. Trust the industry.The truth is that a lot of flying anxiety is caused by projecting and misplacing fears. Your worries are probably not based on whether or not you’re actually safe in your seat in an airplane (in the highly capable hands of the flight crew), but rather the incidental inconveniences and discomforts that disrupt your personal “control” instrument panel. An economy seat in 2014 is not going to be relaxing and comfortable in the manner that you are probably accustomed to at home. Even our most seasoned travelers over here at CheapAir headquarters don’t deny that the seats in coach are often cramped. Some of us even have mild claustrophobia, which, let’s face it, can be exacerbated by sitting knee to knee with a couple of strangers on a full flight. It may take a little pre-flight concentration/meditation, but if you can manage to isolate your feelings of discomfort and loss of control, you’ll be able to better manage those feelings and separate them from feeling unsafe.2. Go with your feelings.Wait a minute, you might be saying. You say I’m starting to feel anxious just as we back away from the gate and I’m supposed to feed that rising sense of panic? Well, yes and no. Basically, science shows that fighting feelings of anxiety can actually inflate those feelings. When you start to feel out of control or panicked, the typical response is to dig in emotionally and fight to try and override the feelings. Most of the time, this tactic just doesn’t work. You actually work yourself into a much more anxious state by battling yourself. If you’re on a flight and you start to feel anxious, take a moment to recognize these feelings and acknowledge them. It could be as simple as saying to yourself, “I am starting to feel very anxious. I am starting to worry about the plane’s safety. My heart is beginning to pound.” The next step is to accept these feelings and say something affirmative to yourself like, “This is going to be tricky but I can handle these feelings. I can get through this.” Finally, take some deep breaths in through your nose and out through your mouth to combat the shallow breathing that can lead to panic attack and hyperventilation.3. Drink responsibly.If you’re feeling anxious, you’re probably planning to have a cocktail (or a few) before the plane takes off and a few more en route. While that does sound like a rollicking good time, we recommend that you do not get plastered on an international flight. Flying while inebriated? Totally fun! Finding your bags and orienting yourself in a city while inebriated? Not so much. Have you ever tried to describe your lost luggage to baggage claim staff while under the residual influence of six glasses of in-flight Cabernet? Not a pretty picture. Also, a drunk tourist might as well be wearing a sign around his neck reading, “Rob Me.” If you’ve just landed in a foreign country and you’re tipsy, you’re catnip to thieves on the airport circuit. On the other hand, dehydration is also your enemy — so do plan on drinking loads of water both before and during the flight. And finally, more bad news. Avoid caffeine and coffee if you’re prone to panic attacks. Wean yourself off it for a few days before you fly if it’s too painful to do cold turkey. A stimulated mind can spin out in all kinds of jittery, panicky directions. Just. Don’t.4. Hold fast to the facts.Remind yourself that the most dangerous part of your travel day is the drive to the airport. Your chance of being in an air disaster is approximately one in three million. You would need to fly once a day for more than 8,200 years to accumulate three million flights. While you should avoid disaster news, it might not be a bad idea to read up on some basic facts and figures about what a normal flight will feel and sound like. There are reasonable explanations for many seemingly distressing noises on a plane. You can even watch a great video called “Flying Without Fear” on YouTube from Virgin Atlantic that illustrates typical sounds and movements on takeoff and landing. Easy peasy.5. Distract yourself.If you know you are going to be anxious, surround yourself with familiar pleasures from home. Load up the iPad with some old school Seinfeld or Friends. Listen to a few of your favorite, relaxing albums. Start a great book before you leave and pick up mid-read during the flight. Basically, don’t depend on the airline to provide you with a distraction that will work for you. Their in-flight programming might not be the medicine you require. The key is to keep these distractions to what you are already accustomed. Think of it as comfort food for your mind.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Which Five Animals Can Be More Deadly Than Sharks?

Which Five Animals Can Be More Deadly Than Sharks?

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) — Despite their terrifying reputation as cold-blooded killing machines, once sharks get a taste of human flesh, they rarely come back for a second bite, according to the Discovery Channel, which is in the midst of its annual Shark Week.In fact, sharks kill only about four people a year worldwide and only one in the U.S., according to the nonprofit organization Oceana.Sharks aren’t even close to being the most deadly animal on Earth. Here are five creatures that are — perhaps surprisingly — more likely to lead to your demise than a shark.
1. HipposThey reach up to 15 feet in length and weigh up to three and a half tons. They can sprint up to 20 miles an hour and their 20-inch teeth never stop growing. And, according to the Bill Gates Foundation, hippopotamus kill up to 500 people a year.Of course, there aren’t any reports of death by hippo on urban streets. Most hippo deaths take place in the wilds of Africa, with one study verifying an average of 30 people a year are killed by hippos in the country of Mozambique alone. In Africa, crocs and elephants are the only land animals more deadly.
2. CowsCows may look docile, but they kill more than five times the number of people than sharks do. Using statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one research study reported an average of 22 deaths a year by bovines, typically due to stomping or goring.The study noted that horses are also pretty lethal, causing up to 20 deaths per year. Agricultural workers are among the groups at greatest risk of “death by mammal,” a category that also lists cats, pigs and raccoons as the cause of death.
3. Dogs
Man’s best friend is high up on the list of killer critters.CDC statistics show nearly 4.5 million Americans are bitten by dogs each year. Half of dog bite victims are children. Though only about 40 canine bites a year are fatal, according to the group dogsbite.org, the CDC reports that nearly 27,000 people require reconstructive surgery yearly as the result of a dog bite.For the record, dogsbite.org identifies pit bulls as the most dangerous dog breed, claiming they account for over 60 percent of reported attacks. Rottweilers, American bull dogs and huskies round out the list of top canine chompers.
4. SnailsThey aren’t large and their top speed is only about three feet per hour, but the United States Agency for International Development lists snails as one of the top killers on the planet.More accurately, certain freshwater snails carry parasitic worms that in turn carry a deadly disease known as schistosomiasis. When humans come into contact with water where these snails live they can become infected and die of organ failure. In sub-Saharan Africa, schistosomiasis is the second-leading cause of death after malaria, with more than 200,000 deaths per year reported.
5. AntsDeath by teeny tiny ant is becoming more common and is almost certainly more common than death by shark — though reliable statistics of ant deaths are hard to come by. We do know that insect stings send more than 500,000 Americans to emergency rooms every year, according to the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and more than 40 people die annually from insect sting anaphylaxis.A recent study listed 280 species of ants throughout the world capable of causing fatalities in humans. The red fire ant, species that has invaded the southeastern part of the U.S. from Asia, stings an estimated 14 million people annually, according to entomological studies done at Texas A&M University.
Up to six percent of the population has a severe reaction to their stings, and a number of deaths have recently been reported. Last year, a woman in Georgia died shortly after being attacked by a swarm of red fire ants.
Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Advertise With Us

Would you like to advertise on East Idaho News? Fill out this form to contact a representative.
  • Full and Last
  • The name of your company, business or brand.