Home » Archives by category » Political News (Page 9)

The Bush Family Thanksgiving Will Be Even More Awkward Than Yours

The Bush Family Thanksgiving Will Be Even More Awkward Than Yours

Photo by Andy Jacobsohn/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- With two former presidents, one former governor, the likely future land commissioner of Texas, one TV news correspondent and a strong-willed matriarch all sitting around one table, this year’s Bush family Thanksgiving will be a gathering unlike any other in America.But it’s clear that, like many other dining room tables across the country, the Bush’s turkey and gravy will be served with a heaping side of political tension. And which member of the Bush clan is likely to be most uncomfortable? That would be former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who’s thought to be contemplating a White House bid. As Jeb Bush’s son, Jeb Bush Jr., acknowledged last month, 2016 is “the 800-pound gorilla in the room” at family gatherings.Recent news reports suggest that Jeb Bush should expect to have his entire political life dissected by his famous family members, who all seem to think they know what’s best for him.“I think he wants to be president,” Jeb Bush’s brother, former President George W. Bush, said on Fox News Thursday. “I think he’d be a great president.”And despite W.’s April 2013 assertion that his brother “doesn’t need my counsel ‘cause he knows what it is,” George W. Bush revealed on Fox that he’d doled out some advice anyway.“I, of course, was pushing him to run for president. He, of course, was saying, ‘I haven’t made up my mind,’” the former president said of a recent conversation between the two brothers. “I don’t think he liked that his older brother was pushing him.”But even as Jeb Bush’s big brother eggs him on, his mother reins him in.“We’ve had enough Bushes” in the White House, Barbara Bush told NBC’s Matt Lauer in April 2013. “There are other people out there that are very qualified. ... It’s not just four families."“He’s by far the best qualified man, but no,” she said, when asked if she’d like to see her son run.Then, earlier this year, she seemed to warm up to the idea -- a flip-flop that is sure to spark some dinner table conversation.“Maybe it’s OK,” she said on Fox & Friends in March 2014. “It just seemed to me ridiculous, in a country of this size, that we didn’t have other families. ... Maybe Jeb’s given all he should give. 'Cause he’s worked awfully hard for a long time. But he is the best qualified person in the country, there’s no question about that. Put me down as saying that.”In April, however, Jeb Bush’s niece, Jenna Bush Hager, let it slip that she doesn’t want to see another Bush in the White House “anytime soon.”“I don’t want to answer that question!” Bush Hager declared.Even as his extended family publicly focus-groups his candidacy, you’d hope Jeb Bush could count on his immediate family's support. But Jeb Bush’s wife, Columba, is rumored to share her mother-in-law and niece’s reticence.His son, George P. Bush, who’s running for Texas Land Commissioner, confirmed that he would at least vote for his father should he mount a bid for the White House in 2016.“I would definitely vote for him, I think it’s safe to say, otherwise I may not be invited back home for Thanksgiving,” the younger Bush said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal published Thursday. But stretching his neck out to formally endorse Dad? That’s another story.George P. Bush’s senior adviser, Trey Newton, later clarified that a promised vote is not the same thing as a formal endorsement and said George P. Bush had no plans to actively campaign for any one presidential candidate, according to Journal reporter Laura Meckler.(That sentiment apparently hasn’t stopped Jeb Bush from stumping for George P. Bush in Texas.)This isn’t the first time George P. Bush, who insists he’s “a man in my own right who stands in my own shoes,” has appeared reluctant to support his father’s presidential ambitions.When asked if he would endorse Jeb Bush’s potential presidential bid in 2016 at the Texas Tribune Festival last month, George P. Bush was evasive.“You’re telling me ... you would not endorse your dad?” Texas Tribune Editor Evan Smith pressed Jeb Bush’s son.“My focus has to be this agency,” George P. Bush replied, referring to the land commissioner position he is seeking this November. “If I’m entrusted by the voters of Texas to be land commissioner, that’s going to occupy my time.”Really, it seems like the only family member who hasn’t taken a position on Jeb Bush’s candidacy is Jeb Bush himself."I'm trying to avoid the family conversation, to be honest with you,” he said during a November 2013 forum at Fordham Law School.He may not be so lucky when it comes to his family.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Irked by Critics, Obama Says He’s Good for Business

Irked by Critics, Obama Says He’s Good for Business

The White House(CHICAGO) -- Deviating from his prepared remarks for minutes at a time, an apparently irked President Obama responded to critics who’ve called him anti-business, pointing to improved corporate profits and mocking Republican policies, during his economic speech in Chicago Thursday.Those critics’ “notion is that this agenda I just outlined is somehow contrary to pro-business, pro-capitalism, free-market values,” Obama said, appearing at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.The president had just reiterated some of the stump-speech points made during his 60 Minutes interview -- that the economy is better than when he took office, but that many Americans aren’t feeling the benefit -- and had gone on to call for his usual array of economic measures: infrastructure spending, tax reform, clean-energy investment, greater availability of high-quality preschool education, immigration reform, student-loan relief, equal pay, paid maternity leave, and, of course, a higher minimum wage.“Since we’re here at a business school, I thought it might be useful to point out … corporate balance sheets are the strongest, just about, that they’ve ever been. Corporate debt is down, profits are up, businesses are doing good. So this idea that somehow any of these policies, like the minimum wage … or clean energy are somehow bad for business is simply belied by the facts -- it’s not true,” Obama said.The president referenced Thursday’s Bloomberg story juxtaposing corporate criticism of Obama with the health of S&P 500 companies, which are seeing their lowest debt-to-earnings ratio in 24 years.Obama challenged Republicans to be a “true opposition party” and lay out their own agenda.“Has anyone seen a credible argument that that is what our economy needs right now? Seriously,” Obama asked of lower taxes on higher incomes.

“Folks are just pontificating … based on what? What’s the data, what’s the proof? If there were any credible argument that says, when those at the top do well, and eventually, everybody else will do well, it would have borne itself out by now. We'd see data that that was true. It's not,” he said.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Hillary Clinton Adds Key Line to Pre-2016 Stump Speech

Hillary Clinton Adds Key Line to Pre-2016 Stump Speech

Alex Wong/Getty Images(MIAMI) -- Charlotte Clinton Mezvinsky is just five days old and already appears to be a living embodiment of themes her grandmother, Hillary Clinton, could put to use on the campaign trail.During her prepared remarks at a women’s real estate convention in Miami Thursday afternoon, the former secretary of state used a line never heard before on her paid-speaking circuit: one about the future for her new granddaughter.“I think my granddaughter has just as much God-given potential as a boy born in that hospital on the same day,” Clinton told the crowd at the Loews Miami Beach Hotel.Chelsea Clinton’s daughter, Charlotte, was born last week in New York City and is the first grandchild for Bill and Hillary Clinton. Thursday’s one-day visit to Miami is the first time Hillary Clinton has traveled outside of the state since the baby’s birth. Earlier this week, she cancelled her appearance at two other fundraising events in Washington, D.C., because of the new baby.In addition to her keynote at the CREW convention Thursday afternoon, Clinton is also holding a book signing for her new memoir, Hard Choices, and campaigning for Florida’s Democratic candidate for governor, Charlie Crist.While Clinton still says she has not made a decision about running for president, equality for women and girls is an issue very close to her and one she will likely bring with her on the campaign trail should she decide to run.Her comments Thursday indicate that the newest addition to the family is well-positioned to play a role in Clinton 2016 -- even if just symbolically.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Midterm Elections: In Search of a Theme

Midterm Elections: In Search of a Theme

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) -- Just one month before the November elections, the fate of the U.S. Senate isn’t the only thing that’s up in the air -- so is the theme of this year’s midterms.Pundits and politicians have been searching for a unifying idea for months. First it was the Republican-inspired government shutdown. Then the botched rollout of the Obamacare website. Then, perhaps, immigration reform (or the lack thereof). Then the disquieting state of international affairs, led lately by the U.S.-fronted campaign against ISIS.But now, with the midterms around the corner, it’s possible no single defining issue will emerge.One thing we do know: The state of the economy is still crucial. Thirty-five percent in last month’s ABC News/Washington Post poll, a plurality of Americans, single out the economy and jobs as the single most important issue in their vote for Congress -- just off the four in ten who did the same in 2010, as the United States was struggling, even more mightily than now, to emerge from the Great Recession.Historically, the economy often is the top issue for a plurality of Americans. But -- unless the economy is overpoweringly awful, or the nation’s entangled in an unpopular war or other, particular crisis -- other issues often share the limelight.In 2002, a bit more than a year after the Sept. 11 attacks, 28 percent in ABC/Post polling picked the economy as the top issue in their vote, but two in 10 cited terrorism and 12 percent said it was the situation in Iraq. Heading into the 2006 midterms, three in 10 said the unpopular war in Iraq was driving their vote; only two in 10 picked the economy. And in 2010, when Obamacare had just become law, 18 percent said health care was their top issue, second to the economy.But there’s no clear second-place issue this year. The way things are working in Washington, health care, international conflicts and immigration clock in at 15, 13, 12 and 10 percent, respectively.Still, this year’s data highlight some notable nuances within this year’s electorate. People under age 50, who have years of work ahead of them in the still-struggling economy, are more apt to be focused on the economy and jobs (44 percent) than those over 50 (28 percent) -- a 16-point gap, compared with just 3 percentage points in 2010. And, though not a new trend, nonwhites and Democrats also are more likely to consider the economy first and foremost.Meanwhile, those with lower socioeconomic status are more apt than their counterparts to focus on health care. People making less than $50,000 and those without a college degree are six points more likely to select healthcare as their most important issue compared with their counterparts, who seem to have moved on from the issue since 2010. (Similar to the last midterms, women are twice as likely as men to cite health care as a top priority, 17 vs. 8 percent this year).A sizable number of independents have turned to “the way Washington is working” as an impetus for their vote: Twenty-one percent of independents -- 9 points more than in 2010 -- put their focus on DC’s inner workings, compared with 12 percent of others. But this discontent is less of an advantage for the GOP than four years ago. In 2010, those who selected the way D.C. works as their top issue in our pre-election polling backed Republican House candidates by a 24-point margin. Today, that group splits almost evenly.Additionally, those older than 40 and whites are twice as likely as their counterparts to select how Washington is working as their top issue (18 vs. 9 percent and 18 vs. 8 percent, respectively). In 2010, by contrast, there were no such divisions among these groups.As we come down the stretch, these differing priorities make it increasingly unlikely that election analysts will get the one central theme for which they’ve been searching. But hey -- there are four weeks left.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Obama’s Road to Refocus

Obama’s Road to Refocus

Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy(WASHINGTON) -- President Obama is back on the road Thursday, trying to refocus attention on his economic record and agenda ahead of the midterms. In a speech at Northwestern University, the president will tout American economic leadership, much as he addressed the role of American leadership abroad during his United Nations speech last week.White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest offered a preview of Obama’s speech in Illinois:

“Six years after the Great Recession, thanks to the hard work of the American people and the policies the President has pursued, our economy has come back further and faster than any other nation on Earth. You’ll hear the President talk about this progress, while acknowledging that too many Americans still don’t feel enough of the benefits of our recovery in their everyday lives. To make sure these gains are felt more broadly, he’ll lay out the commonsense steps our country should take to raise wages for hardworking Americans, continue to create jobs and grow our economy. The location of the President’s speech is fitting -- he will be speaking to an audience of Kellogg business school students who will have a hand in shaping America’s economic future and leadership both at home and abroad.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Congressmen Want Obama to Intercede on Behalf of Marine Jailed in Mexico

Congressmen Want Obama to Intercede on Behalf of Marine Jailed in Mexico

Official White House Photo by Pete Souza(WASHINGTON) -- Andrew Tahmooressi made a wrong turn into Mexico and has been stuck in a jail there for six months because he was carrying three guns in his truck at the time, and he’s been charged as a gunrunner.  His family has successfully kept his case alive in some media circles playing up his previous Marine heroics to complain about what they see as a lack of attention to his case by U.S. officials.  In the middle of a congressional recess, a House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee held a hearing into his case Wednesday that was more of an outlet to vent at the administration and express support for his mother Jill Tahmooressi.  Members of the panel expressed optimism that the situation might be resolved soon now that Tahmooressi has been formally diagnosed as having PTSD. The hope is that Mexico’s Attorney General will dismiss the case.  Jill Tahmooressi read a series of quotes sent to her from her son that demonstrated his deteriorating mental condition. She also highlighted his military service.

“He volunteered and was willing to lose his life for freedom, liberty, and the elimination of oppression. He fought not for one political party, yet he fought for the world at large, including Mexico, who does not send their military to foreign combat," she said. Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., who chaired Wednesday’s hearing said he had recently visited Tahmooressi and said “he'd been through a lot -- attempted to escape and take his own life, haunted by the hyper-vigilance that is the hallmark of his PTSD. Even so, he was polite. He was soft-spoken, a brave American who had defended this country and now needed our help to return home.” Among the panelists at the hearing was former TV talk show host Montel Williams who was present as an advocate of treatment for those suffering PTSD.  “Though Jill can't say it, and the others won't say it, we know for a fact that Sergeant Tahmooressi's time in this prison has been worse than his time in both combat situations," he said. Williams added, “He's going to come back to the United States and have to be treated for his combat PTSD but also his incarceration PTSD.” 

Through tears, Williams pleaded for President Obama to call Jill Tahmooressi.  “If this hearing is going to stop in the next 10 minutes, I think the president needs to pick up the phone in fifteen. Make the call. Make the call today. If he’s not going to call President Nieto, call this woman -- this woman's child. He's a father. I'm a father,” he said.

In his opening statement, the former Navy Lt. Commander said, given what he’s seen of Tahmooressi’s case, he would not advise his 21-year-old son to join the military. Rep. Salmon was among several congressmen who complained about the Obama administration’s trade of five Taliban detainees for Bowe Bergdahl and what they see as a lack of attention to Tahmooressi’s case. “I am mystified that President Obama couldn't find time between negotiating with terrorists to call our ally, the Mexican president, to appeal to him on behalf of our Marine,” Salmon said.

Veteran’s advocate Pete Hegseth told the committee, “Sergeant Bergdahl cost American lives. Sergeant Tahmooressi saved lives. Does that not matter? It's time to bring our Marine home, long overdue, and get him the care that he's earned.” Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, the ranking Democrat on the committee agreed that not enough had been done with Tahmooresi’s case, particularly in light of his previous military service.

 “To see what he is facing now, one of our own, is unimaginable upon coming home. When we serve overseas, the one bright light that we have is the fact that we can come home, and that we come home to our loved ones, and we come home to some sense of normalcy," she said. "And to see now what he's going through, to -- to not have that bright light, is despicable and unimaginable.” Several conservative members complained that President Obama has not reached out to Jill Tahmooressi, and set up their displeasure with the President’s affinity for playing golf.

“What kind of low bar do have set for this president? We ask him to make a phone call? He ought to get his tail down and play some of those Mexican golf courses and get him out of jail in person. That is a low bar to set for the commander-in-chief, a commander-in-chief that should go -- should go to hell and back for one of their men or women who has been left behind as -- as been stated," said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif. "I am not aware of the president taking any action so far to bring our Marine back. And I don't think we've received any information in Congress about actions that have been taken. So I would say, Mr. President, we have a man down. Pick up the phone and do your job on behalf of our Marine."

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Secret Service Director Julia Pierson Is Resigning

Secret Service Director Julia Pierson Is Resigning

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call(WASHINGTON) -- Secret Service Director Julia Pierson, who has been skewered by critics over the Sept. 19 White House security breach, is resigning, sources told ABC News Wednesday.Pierson’s resignation comes in the wake of an incident in which Omar Gonzalez, a knife-wielding Iraq War vet, allegedly managed to slip over the fence, past several layers of security, and into the White House’s East Room, where he was subdued by an off-duty agent.

A second scandal that came to light this wek involved the revelation that an armed man with a criminal record had been allowed to ride in an elevator with the president earlier this month at a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention event in Atlanta. According to White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, the administration was unaware of that incident until shortly before it was reported on Tuesday.

Pierson made the decision to resign on Wednesday because she felt it was in the best interest of the agency, according to White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, who noted that "the president agreed with that assessment." Obama spoke with Pierson on Wednesday afternoon, thanking her for her service.

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson named Joseph Clancy, formerly Special Agent in Charge of the Presidential Protective Division of the Secret Service as the interim Acting Director of the Secret Service.Lawmakers at a congressional hearing Tuesday demanded to know how such a breach of one of the most secure buildings in the world could have taken place."It will never happen again,” Pierson assured lawmakers at the hearing.Congress also questioned her about a 2011 incident in which agents failed to realize the White House had been sprayed by bullets until a housekeeper pointed out a pane of broken glass.“You’re not taking your job seriously,” Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., said. “I have very low confidence in the Secret Service under your leadership.”At least one lawmaker had called for Pierson’s resignation.“I think this lady has to go,” Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the most senior Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said Wednesday. “I’m convinced that she is not the person to lead that agency.”Administration officials had hoped Pierson, named director on March 26, 2013, could overhaul the scandal-plagued agency, which suffers from cultural problems as well as operational ones.

Not long after Pierson assumed her post, the Secret Service, still under fire from the Cartagena, Colombia, prostitution scandal the year before, was lambasted anew when it was discovered that an agent had left a bullet in a Washington hotel room after spending the evening with a woman in May 2013.Though a Homeland Security report released the following December concluded agency leadership hadn’t “fostered an environment that tolerates inappropriate behavior,” concern that agent misconduct might endanger the first family lingered.Then in March 2014, three counterassault agents responsible for protecting Obama in Amsterdam were sent home after getting drunk less than 10 hours before they were expected to report for duty.The agency has also dealt with a spate of White House fence-jumpers -- 17 in the past five years, according to Pierson -- though everyone but Gonzalez was quickly subdued on the lawn.

More ABC news videos | ABC Entertainment News

Follow @ABCNewsRadio

Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Jimmy Carter Celebrates 90th Birthday

Jimmy Carter Celebrates 90th Birthday

Photo by Chris McKay/Getty Images(ATLANTA, Ga.) -- Former President Jimmy Carter, the second-oldest of the living U.S. presidents, turned 90 on Wednesday, blowing out the candles on his cake.President Obama tweeted out birthday wishes for Carter from the White House Twitter account. The message is signed "-bo," indicating that Obama wrote the tweet himself.

 

Happy 90th Birthday, President Carter! Michelle and I send our best wishes to you and Rosalynn. -bo pic.twitter.com/Du99I0S524

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) October 1, 2014

 

Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisconsin, also tweeted a birthday message for the former president and 2002 Nobel Peace Prize winner.

 

Happy 90th birthday to President & Nobel Peace Prize winner Jimmy Carter! pic.twitter.com/oSIrjDKx6k

— Sen. Tammy Baldwin (@SenatorBaldwin) October 1, 2014

 

The Jimmy Carter Presidential Library posted a photo of the ex-president blowing out the candles on its Facebook page.

 

 

Post by Jimmy Carter Presidential Library.

 

 

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Bomb Threat Forces Evacuation Of Sandy Hook School

Hillary Clinton Comforts Military Families Who’ve Lost Loved Ones

Hillary Clinton Comforts Military Families Who’ve Lost Loved Ones

Kendra Helmer/USAID(WASHINGTON) -- In her first public appearance since the weekend birth of granddaughter Charlotte, Hillary Clinton spoke at an event Wednesday evening in New York for an organization that cares for the families of fallen military members, who greeted her with moving stories of their loved ones.“This a great privilege, but it is also for me emotional as we celebrate the birth of our granddaughter and as I look out and see all of you who are thinking of your loved ones and the life that he or she lived,” Clinton said at the event for the Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors or TAPS, a group that supports, connects and provides grief resources to military families who have lost loved ones.In the introduction, TAPS president Bonnie Carroll told Clinton she is “family” and gave her the organization’s Lifetime Service Award. Clinton spoke at another event for the group in 2006 and has served as an honorary chairwoman.Throughout her speech, some in the crowd became emotional and many of them took to the rope line afterwards to share stories of their deceased family members and show photos, with several telling her heartbreaking stories. Some just wanted to take a photo with Clinton, but many more had a story to tell.One woman, after telling the former secretary of state about her fallen husband, said, “I miss him every day, thank you for coming.”Clinton listened to their stories and expressed her condolences, saying over and over again, “I am so, so sorry,” at times holding the family members’ hands. One man told her about his nephew who he said “got the run around” and “got screwed at the VA.”“We need to help the VA and we need to help the mental health system,” he told her. Clinton nodded in agreement.He also urged her to run for president.In her speech, she told the families “it’s really important to me that we never forget your loved ones and we never forget you.”“At a time when sometimes we seem divided and people seem to be arguing all the time we really have to take stock of how blessed we are and grateful for the men and women who serve us and be thankful that we have through all of our ups and downs and our challenges continues to stand for the values that unite us: freedom and democracy and opportunity and by supporting you all who will serve in the future,” Clinton told the crowd at Stella 43 Trattoria, a restaurant inside the iconic New York City Macy’s store.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Obama’s Social Media Strategy Against ISIS Falling Short, Experts Say

Obama’s Social Media Strategy Against ISIS Falling Short, Experts Say

Official White House Photo by Pete Souza(WASHINGTON) -- The Obama administration’s new drive to battle the ideology of ISIS using social media is falling short of expectations and its potential because the White House was late to the game, disregarded the work of the previous administration, and hasn’t properly funded the effort, some experts and government officials say.A major part of the new anti-ISIS tactics, run by the State Department’s Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, is an English-language social media campaign called “Think Again, Turn Away,” which features rapid responses to pro-ISIS rhetoric and sarcastically toned YouTube videos intended to mock ISIS’ fundamentalist intentions. Some of the videos have been criticized as amateurish and ill-suited to their intended targets.One recent “Think Again, Turn Away” video facetiously urged would-be jihadists to “run, don’t walk” to join ISIS and kill fellow Muslims. Tweets from the campaign’s Twitter handle, clearly branded a U.S. government effort, frequently include images, like an old picture, tweeted on Sept. 11 of this year, of the late Osama bin Laden hiding in his compound with the words “Would you throw away your life for those who hide far away?”Such a tactic may have been effective with core al-Qaeda operatives, but less so with the more diffuse groups of today, critics say.The tone and content of the “Think Again, Turn Away” postings do not appeal to the campaign’s key demographic, said James Glassman, the Bush administration’s last Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs who worked with the 2008 Obama team as it transitioned into office, and who championed the use of diplomatic resources to counter-extremism -- in fact helping start a more informal version of the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications.“The kind of person who joins ISIS or AQ who’s in his late twenties is not a particularly rational person at that stage in his life. And to say, ‘Hey, think again’; I’m just a little bit dubious about it,” he said.But former public diplomacy and counterterrorism officials from the Obama and Bush administrations say the program could be much more effective against ISIS now if the White House had been more supportive of its mission back in 2010, when officials from State, DOD, the intelligence community and elsewhere started working together to combat al Qaeda’s digital communications.One former State Department official with knowledge of the formation of the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications said the specialists working on this task sought to make it a permanent, more robust part of the State Department’s public diplomacy apparatus, but the White House’s National Security Council originally wasn’t interested.“They tried to cut it off at the knees at every step,” the official said of the NSC’s inertia on the issue.After several false starts, the official said, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton intervened directly with President Obama, explaining to him the importance of having a centralized group dedicated to countering extremist ideology – mostly from al Qaeda at that point – on their own digital turf, including chat rooms and other digital forums.“The president got the briefing and said, ‘Why aren’t we doing this already?’” the official recounted, saying advocates of the program like Clinton and Daniel Benjamin, the coordinator for counterterrorism at State from 2009 to 2012, pushed the hardest for the president to officially charter CSCC as part of the State Department’s Bureau of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, which he did by executive order in September 2011.An Obama administration official denied that the State Department took the plea directly to the president. “This is an initiative that we prioritized internally and on which the NSC has worked tirelessly to establish and push forward,” the official said.Several former administration officials said part of the resistance was because other agencies like the National Counterterrorism Center were wary of the State Department’s taking ownership of what they believed was their domain, even if the CSCC is an inter-agency program, meaning it includes officials from all over the government.“Inter-agency efforts make sense because all the stakeholders contribute and you avoid stepping all over each other. The downside is agencies always protect their turf,” Tara Sonenshine, the Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs from 2012 to 2013, said. Bush-era public diplomacy officials who worked with the Obama transition team in 2008 said Obama was reluctant to engage in anti-Islamist communications because it clashed with his strategy of reaching out to Muslims who may have been alienated by Bush’s more aggressive tactics.“The assumption is, the evil Bush administration and militarized strategy was toxic to Muslims so we had to show ourselves as friendly,” Mike Doran, the Defense Department’s public diplomacy chief from 2007 to 2008, said of the Obama team’s mind-set.“We thought that we were engaged in not just a physical struggle but an ideological struggle” against Islamist extremists, Glassman, who helped popularize the phrase “war of ideas,” said. “I was told by the transition people [in late 2008], ‘We don’t use that phrase,’” he said.William McCants, the Clinton State Department’s senior adviser for countering violent extremism (CVE), said he disagreed with both Bush and Obama’s approaches because they were too quick to frame the issue as affecting all Muslims, not just a small percentage of evildoers.But regardless of the approach, he said, neither effort was well-funded.“Whether you’re talking about the war of ideas stuff or you’re talking about the hug-the-Muslim-world stuff, both of those bigger efforts were not resourced well in either administration,” McCants said. “The budget for this is tiny in the scheme of things, and given the nature of today’s information environment, digital is where it’s at.”For the past three fiscal years, funding for CSCC has hovered around $5 million, although it’s possible funding will increase as part of Congress’ continuing resolution to fund the government that it has to pass in December.Current and former State Department officials praised the CSCC in their work countering extremist rhetoric abroad, especially their work in foreign languages and combating core al Qaeda, which was more robust when the CSCC began.But the organization appeared to be so under-resourced, and pulled in so many directions, that it was not even working on social media strategies for ubiquitous platforms like Twitter as late as mid-2012.“We are focused overseas in foreign languages and not in English and not in something like Twitter, which is very narrowly defined; that is not an area where we work on a regular basis. Al Qaeda doesn't use Twitter,” CSCC coordinator Alberto Fernandez said in testimony before the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on terrorism in August 2012.Some committee members seemed surprised to hear that the Obama administration’s marquee organization for strategic counterterrorism communications wasn’t operating in those spaces.“The English language is international. And preventing someone fluent in English from becoming radicalized may be many times more important than preventing someone else from being radicalized,” said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., adding that it was hard to criticize Fernandez’s group for not doing more because they had so many responsibilities and so little funding.Added Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C.: “I do think the Department of State and your center do have some jurisdiction in this as regard to what foreign nationals do use Twitter for. And they are absolutely using Twitter.”“Think Again, Turn Away” began tweeting at the end of June of this year.Officials at any federal agency would undoubtedly say their mission could use more money. But McCants said if the Obama administration would widen CSCC’s budget just a bit, it could hire more experts in public diplomacy and strategic communications, like political operatives or satirists, which wouldn’t cost much more but could make a big difference.“If you had money you could really bring in an amazing array of people that could enhance the effectiveness of the program,” he said.Richard LeBaron, who ran the CSCC the year before it became an official part of the State Department, agreed that the administration could get a lot more bang for its buck, likening operatives’ skills to those of a Navy SEAL, but much cheaper.“If you want a cadre of people over time with special operations level, SEAL-team level skills and you want that to be sustained,” he said, “we’ve got to be spending more than we’re spending now.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

White House Fence Jumper Enters Not Guilty Plea

White House Fence Jumper Enters Not Guilty Plea

iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Omar Gonzalez, the man accused of jumping a perimeter fence and running through the first floor of the White House armed with a knife, appeared in federal court Wednesday as his lawyer entered a plea of “not guilty” to the charges against him.Gonzalez, wearing an orange jumpsuit, was led into the courtroom with his hands behind his back and said nothing during the hearing. He listened intently and at one point whispered with his lawyer, public defender David Bos.Wednesday marks the first time the public has seen Gonzalez since the details of his Sept. 19 excursion into the White House were revealed, and the appearance comes the same day Secret Service Director Julia Pierson resigned.After his arrest, Gonzalez was charged with unlawfully entering a restricted building while carrying a dangerous weapon. On Monday, a federal grand jury indicted him for that federal offense as well as violations of DC law: carrying a dangerous weapon outside a home or place of business, and unlawful possession of ammunition.On Wednesday, Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, said that the accused’s next appearance would be Oct. 21 at 10:30. He will be held without bond.The issue of Gonzalez’ competence came up when the judge announced she had received a report from pre-trial services. She suggested she was poised to order a forensic screening.In court, Bos objected, saying there was “no basis” for the screening at this time. Bos pointed out that neither he nor the government had requested a competency evaluation. The judge gave Bos until Thursday to file a motion on the matter.Outside of court, in the hallway, Bos said that if a screening is done, he would insist it be done by one of his experts.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Mitt Romney and 2016: Could It Be True?

Mitt Romney and 2016: Could It Be True?

Robert Giroux/Getty Images(NEW YORK) -- A presidential defeat isn’t an easy thing to bounce back from. And Mitt Romney did it twice. So it was understandable that after he lost the presidential race in 2012, he was adamant about closing the door to the possibility of a third campaign.But recently, speculation is whirling that Romney may not be so adamant anymore.When asked if he was running in a New York Times interview published earlier this week, Romney said: “I have nothing to add to the story. We’ve got a lot of people looking at the race. We’ll see what happens.”That response, which set off the firestorm of speculation about a possible candidacy, is vastly different from the one he issued just nine months ago: “Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no,” he told The New York Times last January at the premiere of Mitt, the documentary about his 2012 candidacy. “People are always gracious and say, ‘Oh, you should run again.’ I’m not running again.”The discrepancy between the two responses has been fueled by Romney's recent presence on the political scene. As midterm campaigns enter the home stretch, his star power seems akin to Hillary Clinton’s for the Democrats. He has stumped for candidates on the campaign trail and sent personal emails requesting fundraising for the National Republican Congressional Committee.Daniel Scarpinato, the group’s national press secretary, previously told ABC News that Romney has an ability to rake in a higher level of contributions for the Republican Party because “a lot of Americans want to see him as president.”Policy-wise, he has been more vocal about publicizing his opposition to the Obama administration, lambasting the president’s foreign policy on Fox News and penning an op-ed opposing cuts to the military in the Washington Post.All of this seems like groundwork for a presidential run. But several people, including his former running mate Paul Ryan, have affirmed that Romney has no interest in running again.

In an interview Tuesday with the Huffington Post Live, Ryan said that, if Romney has reiterated multiple times he isn’t running, then he isn’t running. (Ryan did note however, that if Romney were to run, he would not run against him.)So in short, no one has any idea if Romney is running. If his most recent response is true, he doesn't know either. But the fact that he didn't rule out running means that we don't have to rule him out.And if he does run, his experience and star power could make him a frontrunner. As he told Fox News’ Chris Wallace in 2013 about his 2012 campaign: “I did better this time than I did the time before.”Perhaps the third time could be the charm.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Senators Want Pentagon Probe of Sex Abuse Intimidation Claims

Senators Want Pentagon Probe of Sex Abuse Intimidation Claims

Digital Vision/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Two senators are asking the Pentagon to investigate claims by female soldiers at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, that senior commanders discouraged them from reporting additional sexual assaults.The allegations emerged during the trial of a drill sergeant at the base who was convicted of sexually assaulting eight female trainees under his command.Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) have written Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to urge that the “troubling allegations” be investigated.“We are deeply disturbed by media reports of the testimony of a victim and witness during this court martial that they and those around them were discouraged from reporting sexual assaults by their leadership,” they wrote in a letter sent to Hagel on Tuesday.They cited media reports of the testimony of two female witnesses at the court martial of Staff Sgt. Angel M. Sanchez for sexually assaulting and abusing female solders he was training at Fort Leonard Wood.

Last week, a military judge found Sanchez guilty and recommended a 20-year prison sentence. The sentence must be approved by the post’s commander.One of the witnesses alleged that a lieutenant colonel at the base “told her company of trainees several months ago not to report allegations of sexual assault.” That witness says she now has “issues of trusting those who are in charge of me.”Another female witness testified that her unit’s command sergeant major told her company of military policemen several months ago that “if any more sexual assault cases come forward” the whole company of soldiers would not graduate from advanced individual training.McCaskill and Gillibrand urged Hagel to begin an investigation saying, “If none has been opened, we request that you open one immediately and keep us informed of the progress of that investigation. We know that you share our desire to eliminate this scourge from the military.”“The Department has received the letter from Senators Gillibrand and McCaskill, and will respond promptly and directly to them,” said Pentagon spokesman Maj. James Brindle. “We appreciate their concerns regarding this issue.”An Army spokeswoman said that the U.S. Army’s Training and Doctrine Command had previously conducted an investigation that included a review of issues such as command climate in the unit, particularly as it related to the training, procedures and enforcement of sexual assault prevention program.“The investigation also examined whether unit command statements to trainees were proper and allegations reported as required. The Headquarters Department of the Army is now in receipt of that investigation and is reviewing it,” the spokesman said.Both McCaskill and Gillibrand have been at the forefront of reforming procedures for how the military tackles sexual assault in the military. They have been at odds particularly over Gillibrand’s legislation that would have taken military commanders out of the chain of command in deciding whether to prosecute sexual assault in their units.In the end, the Senate overwhelmingly passed McCaskill’s legislation that among other things said the “good soldier” defense should not be a factor for commanders in determining if a case should proceed to prosecution.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Pizza Guy Is Shaking Up North Carolina Senate Race

Pizza Guy Is Shaking Up North Carolina Senate Race

Megan Morr/For the Washington Post/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- By day, Sean Haugh delivers pizzas and resells old books on Amazon. But moonlighting as North Carolina’s Libertarian Senate candidate, he could serve up the state’s hotly contested Senate seat to Democrats in November.“I’m very much a factor in the race,” Haugh told ABC News.If the contest between Sen. Kay Hagan and Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis remains narrowly divided in the final weeks of the race, political strategists believe Haugh could siphon votes away from Tillis and help hand the incumbent Democrat a victory. Democrats believe North Carolina is increasingly becoming their best firewall to stop Republicans from picking up the six seats needed to win control of the Senate.“If it’s really close -- people might say even at 2 percent -- Haugh would be playing a role in the outcome,” said North Carolina State University political scientist Andrew Taylor.Haugh, 53, is no stranger to state politics. He ran for Senate as a Libertarian in 2002, and has also worked with the state’s Libertarian Party in various capacities. He said he entered the race in February as an “act of conscience.”“There wasn’t any Libertarian stepping up,” he said.His platform, laid out in a series of low-fi YouTube videos filmed at the home bar in his campaign manager’s basement, calls for “peace and fiscal security,” and an alternative to candidates “owned by outside corporate interests.”In 2002, Haugh received 34,000 votes, roughly 1.5 percent of the electorate. Even with little more than $7,000 in contributions and his YouTube channel, he is optimistic about his chances this year.“We have two candidates out there that are really unacceptable,” Haugh said. “People are repulsed by the negativity and look for an alternative.”Republicans see a path to reclaiming the Senate majority through Sen. Kay Hagan’s seat in the increasingly conservative state. While vulnerable, the freshman Democrat has proven surprisingly resilient.“Hagan has run a perfect race with no mistakes,” said Larry Shaheen, a North Carolina Republican strategist.Hagan led Tillis 46 percent to 43 percent in a recent CNN poll. Haugh captured 7 percent of likely voters in the same survey -- votes both major party candidates could sorely miss on Election Day should the race remain close.Republicans have enlisted the likes of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to boost Tillis on the campaign trail. Sen. Rand Paul appeared with Tillis in Raleigh Wednesday.Paul endorsed tea party candidate Greg Brannon in the Republican primary, but has lent his Libertarian credentials to Tillis' efforts. Besides his appearance Wednesday, the Kentucky Republican has filmed ads with the Chamber of Commerce that will air in the state in support of Tillis.“Republicans are worried,” Haugh said of his candidacy. “They’ve got a lot of internal problems with the party.”Neither campaign responded to requests from ABC News for comment on Haugh’s campaign.Haugh’s calls for ending American military intervention and legalizing marijuana make him a “different kind of Libertarian” than those who could siphon away conservative voters from Republicans in Senate races, said Taylor.“It would be wrong for Tillis to worry about Haugh, and not his head-to-head matchup with Hagan,” he said.But Haugh called the attention his campaign has received a “tremendous victory.”“However many votes I get, that’s a message,” he said.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Rep. Cummings on Secret Service Director: ‘This Lady Has to Go’

Rep. Cummings on Secret Service Director: ‘This Lady Has to Go’

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- After sleeping on Secret Service Director Julia Pierson’s testimony, Rep. Elijah Cummings, the most senior Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is calling for Pierson’s resignation.“The president is not well served. …I think this lady has to go -- Ms. Pierson,” Cummings, D-Md., said during a radio interview with Roland Martin on NewsOneNow Wednesday morning. ”There has to be drastic changes.”It appears that the latest news about an incident in Atlanta, where the president ended up on an elevator with a contractor who was a convicted felon and had concealed a firearm, was the final straw for Cummings.“I’m convinced that she is not the person to lead that agency. My trust has eroded,” Cummings later told Diane Rhem during another interview Wednesday on WAMU. “This is supposed to be the No. 1 protective agency in the world, guarding the most protected person in the world, the most protected house in the world. And it appears they are not doing a very good job.”Initially after the hearing Tuesday, Cummings refused to call on Pierson to step down, saying, “the jury is still out,” and that he didn’t “think she should necessarily resign.”“I think that we are going to have to keep a very close watch on this agency,” he said Tuesday following a closed-door executive session with Pierson.Cummings, who said he expects to have a one-on-one conversation with Pierson on Wednesday, is now the first member of Congress to flatly call for Pierson to go.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

NM Senate Candidate Stands by Controversial Campaign Video

NM Senate Candidate Stands by Controversial Campaign Video

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- New Mexico Republican Senate candidate Allen Weh says he didn’t intend to make national headlines with the release of a provocative web video that used a frame of video of American journalist James Foley’s killer -- a move his critics called “offensive.”But now that he is in the spotlight, Weh told ABC News he has absolutely no regrets over his controversial entrance onto the national stage.“I'm not a politically correct guy in a lot of ways, that's one thing,” Weh said. “This town may not be ready for me. I will call a spade a spade.”Standing by the campaign video, Weh writes off the blowback he’s received as isolated “far left” critics, and points out that the Web video only showed an image of Foley’s killer and not some of the more graphic scenes.“It didn't include the frame of the beheading, it included the frame of the killer,” said Weh. “The whole message was very simple: failed leadership in Washington. …[It had] nothing to do with that one particular jihadist.”Weh, a retired Marine who has served in active duty three times, including in Vietnam and Iraq, is framing his military experience as an asset in a campaign that is considered an uphill battle against Democratic incumbent Sen. Tom Udall.“I'm going to advocate for a strong American leadership in the world based on my experience,” he said.“It's important when it comes to these issues, because I look at things with great deliberation. I'm going to be the last guy to vote to put our men and women in uniform in harm's way until it's absolutely necessary,” Weh said. "You’ve got to have a strategy, and you've got to have an end state. And when you have that, you turn it over, you select your plan to achieve that strategy and the goal, and you go for it.”As President Obama weighs his options to counter the rise of ISIS, Weh has played up his democratic opponent’s connections to the commander-in-chief, arguing that the president’s approach to foreign policy has failed."He's let domestic politics drive his agenda,” Weh said of Obama. “You can't put your head in the sand, because the bad guys in the world aren't going to let us put our heads in the sand. That's part of the job I don't think he appreciated when he got elected. Well, he's getting a full dose of it now -- but he's got to man up to it.”Though Weh has never held political office before, this is not his first foray into New Mexico politics.He competed in the state’s 2010 gubernatorial race, but lost the Republican nomination to Susana Martinez, who went on to clinch the New Mexico governorship in the general election.Now, Martinez’s name is being floated as a potential 2016 presidential contender.Though Weh said he has since “mended fences” with Martinez, and that “she’s doing a great job” as governor, he declined to say whether he thinks she would make a good presidential candidate, should she run.“Let me get elected, and then I'll come back on your show and we can talk about presidential politics -- but I'm staying away from that,” Weh said.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Pelosi ‘Subscribes’ to Cummings’ Analysis that Julia Pierson Should Resign

Pelosi ‘Subscribes’ to Cummings’ Analysis that Julia Pierson Should Resign

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says she subscribes to Rep. Elijah Cummings' analysis that the director of the Secret Service, Julia Pierson, should resign.“If Mr. Cummings thinks that she should go, I subscribe to his recommendation,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said during a news conference Wednesday at the Capitol. “I agree with his analysis, yes,” she reiterated. “If that’s what he is suggesting, I support his suggestion. But if you follow up and say, ‘tell me why you think she should leave,’ I don’t have the knowledge that he has so I am subscribing to his superior judgment and knowledge on the subject.”Pelosi also joins a number of lawmakers, including Cummings, D-Md., who are calling for an independent investigation of the Secret Service after numerous incidents jeopardized their trust in the agency to guard the president. “In terms of the Secret Service and the protection of the president of the United States…there has to be an independent investigation as to what is going on at the Secret Service,” she said. “The protection of the president has to be precise, it has to be flawless and there has to be accountability when that is not the case.”While she said she agrees with Cummings, Pelosi also said she believes the problems at the troubled agency “may be more than one person.”“I’d like to see an investigation of the culture and the procedure and the accountability in the Secret Service, because while I have confidence in Mr. Cummings, complete confidence, I do think that the challenge may go beyond [Pierson], because some problems existed before she was there,” Pelosi said. “Her leaving doesn’t end the need for us to know a lot more about what is happening. But again, I would accept the recommendation of [Cummings],” she added.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Behind Congress’ ‘Attack’ on NFL Tax Breaks

Behind Congress’ ‘Attack’ on NFL Tax Breaks

iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- A raft of damaging headlines have sparked new efforts on Capitol Hill to hit the NFL where it hurts: in the pocketbook.New bills were introduced in recent weeks to strip the National Football League of its not-for-profit status, which it holds despite the billions in revenue it helps deliver for teams, and the $44 million annual compensation package enjoyed by the league’s commissioner, Roger Goodell.In the latest episode of the ESPN/ABC podcast “Capital Games,” Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton -- co-sponsor of the House bill that would end that tax break -- said the push is yet another way she hopes the NFL will force the Washington football team to change its nickname.“The NFL greed is so widespread that they’ve chosen to operate as a tax-exempt organization. So we want to take that choice away from them unless, and until, they decide not to profit from a name that has now officially been declared a racial slur,” said Norton, the Democratic non-voting House member who represents the District of Columbia.“We’re talking about the people’s money. Whether this gains traction, it’s another level of attack on the NFL,” Norton added.While Norton is focused primarily on getting her hometown Washington Redskins to change their name, the issue of the league’s tax status is facing renewed scrutiny in the wake of a spate of domestic violence incidents involving players, in addition to recurring issues around substance abuse and head injuries.The new efforts are being championed primarily by Democrats, including Norton, Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington, and Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey. But they could dovetail with a longstanding push led by conservative Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to end the special tax treatment enjoyed by the NFL, NHL and PGA, among other sports leagues.Also on the podcast, National Journal columnist and veteran political analyst Norm Ornstein talked about what he calls the “unhealthy and unholy relationship the NFL has long maintained with Congress.” Ornstein believes the time is coming for Congress to end the “crony capitalism” that has allowed the league to get special treatment under the tax code.Meanwhile, Michael McCann, a University of New Hampshire law professor who writes about sports legal issues for Sports Illustrated, said the tax exemption doesn’t mean that much to the NFL. He said he doesn’t see Congress moving to end it, and noted that the not-for-profit status is limited to the central league office, not the profitable individual teams.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

POLL: Broad Backing for Airstrikes on ISIS; Less for US Forces as Advisers in Iraq

POLL: Broad Backing for Airstrikes on ISIS; Less for US Forces as Advisers in Iraq

iStock/Thinkstock(NEW YORK) -- Seven in 10 Americans support airstrikes against Islamic State insurgents in Syria, but far fewer back sending U.S. forces to Iraq as advisers -- evidence in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll of the political risks of returning U.S. soldiers to that volatile region.Fifty-three percent support sending U.S. forces to train Iraqi government troops and coordinate air strikes against Islamic State positions. But that’s comparatively modest in terms of support for military action, and 17 percentage points behind the public’s endorsement of airstrikes.

[See PDF with full results, charts and tables here.]

The Obama administration’s campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria includes placing U.S. advisers in Iraq to coordinate airstrikes, and training of Iraqi forces may occur. The president -- perhaps cognizant of broad public dismay with the U.S. intervention in Iraq under his predecessor, George W. Bush -- has pledged not to engage U.S. forces in a combat role.Obama himself has a 50 percent approval rating for handling the conflict with ISIS in this poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates -- far from stellar but exceeding the 44 percent who disapprove. It’s also more than the 42 percent approval of his handling of the situation in Iraq in June and August, before U.S.-led airstrikes were extended to ISIS positions in Syria.Notably, Obama receives approval from 30 percent of Republicans and 38 percent of conservatives for his handling of the situation -- well short of majorities, but also far above his overall job approval ratings from those groups, 10 and 19 percent, respectively, in an ABC/Post poll in early September. He also gets 45 percent approval from political independents for handling the confrontation with ISIS, 8 points better than his overall job rating from this group.ACTION – The results on military action align with longstanding public attitudes on military intervention, with lower-risk airstrikes far preferred than more-committing ground combat. Support for military action also can rely on the presence of a clear threat -- which the public sees in ISIS (six in 10 in early September called it a “very” serious threat to U.S. vital interests) -- and broad international participation, which Obama has worked to achieve.Among groups, support for airstrikes is almost the same among men and women, at 72 and 69 percent, respectively, despite customarily higher support for military action among men. Support for sending U.S. forces in an advisory role reverts to form, dropping by 11 points among men but further, by 23 points, among women.There are risks for Obama; sending advisers is least popular among some of his core support groups, including half or fewer of nonwhites, liberals, younger and lower-income adults, as well as women. Young adults, age 18 to 29, also are comparatively skeptical about airstrikes -- 55 percent support them, vs. 80 percent of those age 50 and older.Regardless of divisions about advisers on the ground, the poll indicates the level of public antipathy toward ISIS. Support for airstrikes against the group in Iraq started at 45 percent in June, rose to 54 percent in August and then to 71 percent in early September, when 65 percent also said they’d support extending those strikes to Syria. With that air campaign now underway, its 70 percent support reflects a broad level of agreement in fractious political times.METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cell phone Sept. 24-28, 2014, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,001 adults. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Obama ‘Retains Full Confidence’ in Secret Service Despite Security Failures

Obama ‘Retains Full Confidence’ in Secret Service Despite Security Failures

Official White House Photo by Pete Souza(WASHINGTON) -- The Secret Service has been facing tough questions in recent days after it was learned that the man who jumped the White House fence on Sept. 19 got farther into the building than previously believed.White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday that despite the concerns, President Obama "retains full confidence in the men and women of the Secret Service to do their very important work." He would not, however, say whether the president was aware of the full details of the intrusion, other than to note that Obama has "gotten a couple of briefings on this matter."Also on Tuesday, a Secret Service official told ABC News that in a separate incident, first reported by the Washington Examiner, an armed man was allowed in an elevator with the president during a CDC event in Atlanta earlier this month. The official said that the individual was flagged for acting unprofessionally in the elevator, and that the Secret Service later determined that he had been charged with a crime. It was not immediately clear whether the man had been convicted. The official said that Obama was not in any danger, though the incident will likely raise more questions."There's a common interest that exists between all of you, those of us here at the White House that work directly for the president and the officials at the Secret Service to provide accurate information as soon as possible to the American public," Earnest said Tuesday.Also on Tuesday, the fence jumper, Omar Gonzalez, was indicted by a federal grand jury. Gonzalez faces one federal charge of unlawfully entering a restricted building or grounds while carrying a deadly or dangerous weapon. He also faces charges for two violations of District of Columbia law -- carrying a dangerous weapon outside of a home or place of business, and unlawful possession of ammunition. He is expected to appear in court on Wednesday.

More ABC news videos | ABC Entertainment News

Follow @ABCNewsRadio

Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Advertise With Us

Would you like to advertise on East Idaho News? Fill out this form to contact a representative.
  • Full and Last
  • The name of your company, business or brand.