Big Bucks for Bettors on Kate Middleton’s Royal Baby


Matt Cardy/Getty Images(NEW YORK) — Will Kate Middleton have a Caesarean or a natural birth?  Will the baby’s hair be “ginger,” like Uncle Harry, or blonde like late grandma Diana?

Those are some of the pressing questions on the minds of royal watchers — and gamblers — worldwide.  And they’re hoping that the chips will fall in their favor.

Betting on the offspring of Prince William and Kate Middleton, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, began “the second we found out that she was with child,” in December 2012, said Rupert Adams, a spokesperson for William Hill, one of the largest bookmakers in the U.K.

After Middleton was admitted to the hospital with severe morning sickness, rumors began circulating that she was having twins.  Immediately, “we had a market out there saying it was 33 to 1 that she was having twins,” said Adams.

Then there was “D-Gate” — that is, when Middleton may or may not have said, “I’ll take a teddy for my d–,” during a conversation with a fan in March.

“Every single bet was that it’s a girl,” said Hill.  He doesn’t necessarily buy it, however. 

“She might have meant ‘dog,'” he notes.

Bets have also been placed on the date the child will be born — with July 13 a favorite (10-1 odds) — and the baby’s weight (8 pounds).  There have also been debates on whether Middleton will be, as Adams so delicately put it, “too posh to push.”

“She’s favored to have a C-section,” he said.

The most vital question, though, is the baby’s name.  In mid-April, said Adams, “Alexandra” — Queen Elizabeth’s middle name, Queen Victoria’s real name and the name of King Edward VII’s wife — was all the rage.

“Over a 48-hour period, we took over 400 bets over Alexandra,” said Adams.

While other popular guesses include Elizabeth, Diana and Mary, others are a little more creative.

Jessica Bridge, a spokesperson for Ladbrokes, another large U.K. bookmaker, said that in December her company received a 10-pound wager for the baby to be called, “Rylan” at 1,000-1 odds.

“Not sure the royal couple are X Factor fans,” she said.

Carole (25-1 odds), Phillipa (20-1), Spencer (33-1) and Oliver (33-1) were other possibilities.

In 1982, William Hill paid out nearly 30,000 pounds when Prince Charles and Princess Diana named their first child William.  Bridge predicted the payouts will be even bigger this time around.

“This is certainly the biggest novelty event in history,” she said.  “Kate and Wills are even bigger than Charles and Diana.  They’ve really captured the hearts and imaginations of people around the world.  I think it’s because they’re this young couple and sort of normal.  William has a job, Kate has a job.  We can relate to them, even though they are the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.  They’re not stuffy and boring.”

Though Americans might be able to relate to the royal couple, they are not allowed to bet on them in the United States.

“In the U.K., they have been doing these types of things for a long time; you can bet on virtually anything,” said A.G. Burnett, chairman of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board.  “Here, historically and culturally, we look at it from a different perspective.  Aside from casino-style games, we really only have sports wagering and that’s a fairly highly regulated activity.”

“Someday, we might go down that path, but it’s just not been something of high demand for us,” he added.

Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *